Variation of reflectivity with angle (AVA)

ADVERTISEMENT
From SEG Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Problem 3.12a

The values in Table 3.12a illustrate the differences that the interstitial fluid can produce. Calculate the reflectivity for shale-brine sand and shale/gas sand interfaces at incident angles of , , , , and .

Background

It is difficult to tell from the Zoeppritz equations how the variation of amplitude with angle of incidence is affected by changes in the various parameters involved. Shuey (1985) simplified the equations by assuming that the changes in physical properties at an interface are small, so that the raypath bending is small, resulting in Shuey’s equation:

Table 3.12a. Values for AVA/AVO calculations.
Medium (m/s) (m/s) (g/cm)
Shale 2742 1394 2.062 1.967
Brine sand 2833 1470 2.078 1.927
Gas sand 2371 1473 2.044 1.610


(3.12a)

where


(3.12b)


(3.12c)

and is Poisson’s ratio.

Hilterman (1989) introduced additional approximations resulting in


(3.12d)

Solution

Note that 4 significant figures are required to illustrate the effect. We first calculate for the three beds using equation (10,2) in Table 2.2a:

We take the following average values and increments : , , ,

Using these values for the Shuey equation for the shale/brine-sand interface, equations (3.12a,b,c) give

At the shale-gas sand interface, averages and increments are , , , , ,

Substituting , in equation (3.12d), we get for the Hilterman equation (3.12d) for the shale/brine-interface,


Table 3.12b. Comparison of predictions by Shuey and Hilterman equations.
For shale/brine sand
Shuey equation 0.0202 0.0182 0.0128 0.0052 –0.0022
Hilterman equation 0.0202 0.0189 0.0152 0.0095 0.0026
For the shale/gas sand
Shuey equation –0.0765 –0.0881 –0.1221 –0.1782 –0.2558
Hilterman equation –0.0765 –0.0837 –0.1044 –0.1361 –0.1750
Figure 3.12a.  Reflectivity versus angle; solid line, Shuey equation; dashed, Hilterman equation.


The Hilterman equation (3.12d) for the shale/gas-sand interface is

Table 3.12b compares the values given by the Shuey and Hilterman equations and the results are graphed in Figure 3.12a.

The two equations give essentially the same results for angles up to . The increase of amplitude with angle (offset) is larger with the Shuey equation. An additional term that becomes important at large angles is sometimes added to these equations.

Continue reading

Previous section Next section
AVO versus AVA and effect of velocity gradient Accuracy of normal-moveout calculations
Previous chapter Next chapter
Theory of Seismic Waves Geometry of seismic waves

Table of Contents (book)

Also in this chapter

External links

find literature about
Variation of reflectivity with angle (AVA)
SEG button search.png Datapages button.png GeoScienceWorld button.png OnePetro button.png Schlumberger button.png Google button.png AGI button.png