Practical aspects of slant stacking

ADVERTISEMENT
From SEG Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Seismic Data Analysis
Seismic-data-analysis.jpg
Series Investigations in Geophysics
Author Öz Yilmaz
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560801580
ISBN ISBN 978-1-56080-094-1
Store SEG Online Store


First, we examine the interrelations between various domains used in seismic data processing. Consider a band-limited dipping event in the t − x domain as shown in Figure 6.3-13. The offset range is from 250 to 5000 m with a trace spacing of 50 m. This event is mapped along a radial line AA′ in the f − k domain.

The slope of the radial line, ω/kx is related to the horizontal phase velocity v/sin θ by the relationship


(6)

Substitute for p = sin θ/v to find the relationship between the variables in the transform domain given by


(7)

Figure 6.3-13 also shows the mapping of the dipping event to the τ − p domain. Note that a linear event in the t − x domain maps onto a point in the τ − p domain. Converse also is true — a linear event in the τ − p domain maps onto a point in the t − x domain.

A 1-D Fourier transform of the slant-stack traces in the time direction gives the amplitude spectrum in the ω − p domain, which also is shown in Figure 6.3-13. Actually, the ω − p plane describes the frequency dependency of horizontal phase velocity and is used in analyzing guided waves (Section F.1). The energy along the radial direction AA′ in the ω − kx domain is equivalent to that along the vertical direction BB′ in the ω − p domain.

Figure 6.3-14 shows a spatially aliased dipping event. Again, as in Figure 6.3-13, the offset range is from 250 to 5000 m with a trace spacing of 50 m. The wraparound observed in the ω − kx plane results from the inadequate spatial sampling of the event. Note that both the unaliased component, segment 1, and the aliased component, segment 2, map onto a single p trace. We expect the spatially aliased part to map onto a number of negative p traces. However, if this were the case, then the aliased frequency range (21 to 42 Hz) would be absent from the ω − p plane in which only the positive p values were included.

We now outline the steps involved in slant-stack processing that includes forward and inverse τ − p transforms.

  1. Start with the offset data, apply linear moveout correction for a specified value of p, and sum over offset (equations 4a, 4b). Repeat for a range of p values, the output is the slant-stack gather (Figure 6.3-8).
  2. Apply a particular process in the slant-stack domain, such as dip filtering or deconvolution.
  3. Apply rho filtering to the processed slant-stack gather.
  4. Then, apply inverse linear moveout correction for a specified offset value, and sum over the p-range (equations 5a, 5b). Repeat for all offsets; the output is the slant-stack processed offset data.


(4a)


(4b)


(5a)


(5b)


We illustrate the forward and inverse τ − p transforms using the synthetic CMP gather shown in Figure 6.3-15. This figure also shows the slant-stack and reconstructed CMP gather without any process applied, except the rho filter. The linear streaks labeled as CT on the slant-stack gather in Figure 6.3-15 are caused by the finite cable length. To minimize the streaks, for each trace in the t − x domain, Kelamis and Mitchell [1] limit the mapping from the t − x domain to the τ − p domain to a time-variant zone in the τ − p domain. Specifically, only one trace at a time from the t − x domain is mapped onto all p traces. The resulting τ − p gather is muted on both the low and high end of the p-axis in a time-varying manner. The mute functions are based on a representative primary velocity function.

During reconstruction of the t − x gather, we do not have to use the same trace spacing that was used for the original t − x gather. Consider the synthetic CMP gather in Figure 6.3-16a. The 2-D amplitude spectrum shows that frequencies above 48 Hz are spatially aliased (Figure 6.3-16b). This gather can be mapped to the slant-stack domain (Figure 6.3-16c) and reconstructed using a finer trace spacing (Figure 6.3-16d). The original trace spacing is 25 m; the reconstructed gather has a trace spacing of 12.5 m. The 2-D amplitude spectrum of the trace-interpolated gather shows that no frequencies are spatially aliased (Figure 6.3-16e). Nevertheless, note the missing high-frequency energy beyond 60 Hz. This energy mainly is along the steep direct arrival path in the input gather (Figure 6.3-16a) and is absent in the output gather (Figure 6.3-16d). We see that reconstruction can be successful even for spatially aliased data, provided dips do not have a wide range of variation.

References

  1. Kelamis and Mitchell (1989), Kelamis, P. G. and Mitchell, A. R., 1989, Slant-stack processing: First Break, 7, 43–54.

See also

External links

find literature about
Practical aspects of slant stacking
SEG button search.png Datapages button.png GeoScienceWorld button.png OnePetro button.png Schlumberger button.png Google button.png AGI button.png