Fault interpretation using time slices
The series of time slices shown in Figure 12.9a may be faulted. Where are possible faults and what can you infer about them? Assume a velocity of 3000 m/s.
Time slices show the strike of features. Faults are suggested where reflections terminate systematically. A horizon slice that cuts through the 3-D volume along a picked horizon is often the best way to see stratigraphic features.
Assuming that the closure is due to an anticline, the only offset of the pattern that might suggest faulting is seen on slices (iii) to (v) in Figure 12.9a. This suggests an east-west down-to-the-south fault dipping to the north, i.e., a reverse fault, as suggested in Figure 12.9b. However, as drawn, the fault dip is only slightly greater than the bedding dip, which is geologically unreasonable. An alternative and more probable explanation is that it represents a re-entrant (valley) cutting into the structure roughly along the same alignment. A horizon slice should be created to corroborate a channel interpretation, since channels show up best on horizon slices.
Locate possible faults on Figure 12.9c.
The very obvious offset of the contours (A on Figure 12.9d) almost certainly indicates a fault. The abrupt change of dip () probably indicates another fault. The location of these features becomes less clear toward the southern edge of this time slice. Study of other time slices or vertical sections would probably clarify the matter.
|Previous section||Next section|
|Loop layout for a 3D survey||Acquisition direction for marine 3D surveys|
|Previous chapter||Next chapter|
|Geologic interpretation of reflection data||Specialized techniques|
Also in this chapter
- Spatial sampling restrictions
- Bin size in marine work
- Effect of crosscurrents
- Number of seismic sources
- Circle shooting
- Ocean-bottom cable surveys
- Vibroseis land survey
- Loop layout for a 3D survey
- Fault interpretation using time slices
- Acquisition direction for marine 3D surveys