# Reflection moveout

Moveout is the Doodlebugger's term (still in use today) for the progressive delay of reflection arrivals with increasing source-receiver offset. Historically, a series of approximations have addressed this problem:

## Hyperbolic Moveout

For a homogeneous isotropic overburden above a horizontal reflector, the P-wave moveout times are given by

**(1)**

where is the overburden velocity. This *hyperbolic* equation is just a statement of the Pythagorean Theorem.

A simple application of Taylor's theorem results in a generalization of this:

**(2)**

This is just a first-order expansion of in normalized small offsets . This hyperbolic moveout equation is just mathematics, with almost no physics at all. However, it is useful because:

a. It reduces to (1) in the case of homogeneous overburden.

b. It obeys the Scalar Reciprocity Theorem. (For example, an expansion of in terms of is *not* the same when source and receiver positions are interchanged (so that ), so such an expansion would not be valid.)

Equation (2) is valid for inhomogeneous, anisotropic media, for sufficiently short offsets. It does *not* assume straight rays, only short offsets. The parameter is empirically determined, by "flattening the gather".

The first analytic treatment of moveout which addressed inhomogeneity of *rock properties* was due to Dix^{[1]}. For 1D (layered) isotropic media, with sufficiently short offsets:

**(3)**

with the sum over all layers above the reflector. is the (constant) velocity of layer , and is its two-way vertical travel time. It does *not* assume straight rays, but observes Snell's law at every layer boundary. (There is an implicit assumption here that the layers are *coarse* layers, so that the wave equation applies, rather than the equation of motion.) This equation underlies the so-called Dix formula for the interval velocities .

If the reflector dips, further considerations occur.

## Nonhyperbolic Moveout

The hyperbolic equations (2) and (3) were used by the Doodlebuggers to find most of the oil reserves we know today. But, when the utility of AVO became apparent, the industry began to use longer offsets (for AVO leverage), and so these approximations were not sufficient to flatten these longer gathers. So, the obvious thing to do was to make a higher-order Taylor expansion^{[2]}:

**(4)**

where the fourth-order coefficient is a *second* moveout parameter. Like (2), equation (4) is mostly just mathematics, with the only physics in it being the restriction to even powers of . It is valid for inhomogeneous, anisotropic media, for sufficiently short offsets (generally somewhat longer than those adequately described by (2)).

If the subsurface is assumed to be a sequence of coarse isotropic horizontal layers, then^{[3]}:

**(5)**

*i.e.*, it does not have to be empirically determined, but can be calculated from the interval velocities found from equation (3). This shows that non-hyperbolic moveout occurs with isotropic layering. However, it has been found that equation (5) usually does not adequately predict the value of found empirically from flattening the gathers, using equation (4).

Further, equation (4) is unstable, overly sensitive to the furthest offsets (because of the quartic powers of x), so a physically-based modification was proposed^{[3]}:

**(6)**

where is to be chosen so that, at the furthest offsets, the second term in the denominator dominates the "1", and the factor cancels two of the factors in the numerator, and the times increase with the *horizontal* velocity. However, equation (6) requires that the processor must determine the third moveout processor from the data; this is normally not feasible. Hence, equation (6) has not been very useful.

## Anisotropic Moveout

This impasse was resolved by recognizing the ubiquity of anisotropy. For a homogeneous polar anisotropic overburden above a horizontal reflector, the P-wave short-spread moveout times are given^{[4]} by equation (2), with

**(7)**

where is the overburden *vertical* velocity, and is the near-offset anisotropy parameter. For this same case of homogeneous polar anisotropic overburden, with longer offsets, the moveout is given approximately by^{[5]}:

**(8)**

where is a combination of previously defined anisotropic parameters. This resembles equation (6), but with only one non-hyperbolic parameter required, hence it is feasible for processors to use.

This idea is commonly used to describe non-hyperbolic moveout in *inhomogeneous* 1D media, in the form

**(9)**

where the effective non-hyperbolic moveout parameter is given by^{[3]}:

**(10)**

(compare with (5)), which reduces to (8) for a single layer. Here,

**(11)**

with the vertical velocity in layer , and its short-spread anisotropy parameter.

## References

- ↑ Dix, C. H., 1955, Seismic velocities from surface measurements: Geophysics, 20, 68–86.
- ↑ TANER, M. T., and F., KOEHLER, 1969. VELOCITY SPECTRA-DIGITAL COMPUTER DERIVATION AND APPLICATIONS OF VELOCITY FUNCTlONS, GEOPHYSICS, VOL 34(6), pp. 859-881.
- ↑
^{3.0}^{3.1}^{3.2}Tsvankin, I., and L. Thomsen, 1993. Nonhyperbolic Reflection Moveout, GEOPHYSICS, 59(8), 1290-1304. - ↑ Thomsen, L., 1986a. Weak Elastic Anisotropy, Geophysics, 51(10), 1954-1966.
- ↑ Alkhalifah, T. and I. Tsvankin, 1995. Velocity analysis for transversely isotropic media: Geoph., 60, 1550-1566.