The parabolic Radon transform
![]() | |
Series | Investigations in Geophysics |
---|---|
Author | Öz Yilmaz |
DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560801580 |
ISBN | ISBN 978-1-56080-094-1 |
Store | SEG Online Store |
An alternative to stretching in the time direction to attain the linear form of the Radon transform (equations 13a, 13b) is given by Hampson [1]. First, the input CMP gather is NMO corrected using the hyperbolic moveout equation
( )
where tn is the time after NMO correction, and vn is the hyperbolic moveout correction velocity function. Resulting moveouts of the events, which were originally hyperbolic, are now approximately parabolic:
( )
where τ is the two-way zero-offset time, and q is the parameter that defines the curvature of the parabola.
In the coordinates of the NMO-corrected gather d(h, tn), equations (10a, 10b) take the forms
( )
and
( )
The strategy for computing the hyperbolic Radon transform by performing least-squares minimization for each frequency component of the input data in the stretched coordinates also applies to the moveout-corrected data to compute the parabolic radon transform. Fourier transform the moveout-corrected CMP gather d(h, tn) in the direction of the moveout correction time variable tn. Correspondingly, apply Fourier transform to equation (18b) with respect to tn to obtain
( )
where ωn is the Fourier dual of tn.
For each ωn, define d′ : d′(h, ωn) and u : u(q, ωn) as complex vectors in h and q, respectively. With the new definitions of d′ and u, equation (19) can then be written in the matrix form of equation (15), where L now is a complex matrix given by equation (F-29) of Section F.3. The solution that minimizes the least-squares error vector e : e(h, ωn), now defined in the ωn domain, accordingly, is given by equation (16).
The complex vectors d′ and u have lengths nh, the number of offsets, and nq, the number of constant q values used in the transform defined by equation (19), respectively. The complex matrix L then has dimensions nh × nq. For a typical field data set, nh = 60 and nq = 60; hence, the complex matrix L may have dimensions of 60 × 60. As for equation (13b), instead of solving one single problem using equation (18b) in the moveout correction time t′ domain that involves a very large matrix, we solve nω problems, where nω is the number of frequencies ωn, in the Fourier transform domain using equation (19) involving a small matrix L of equation (F-29).
We now outline the velocity-stack processing based on the discrete parabolic radon transform [1].
- Start with a CMP gather, d(h, t) and apply NMO correction, d(h, tn).
- Fourier transform in the tn direction, d(h, ωn).
- For each ωn, set up the L matrix (equation F-29) based on the geometry of the CMP gather and solve for u of equation (16) using the singular-value decomposition (Section F.3).
- Inverse Fourier transform to get u(q, τ), the parabolic radon transform.
- Perform a desired operation, such as muting the zone of multiples, in the parabolic radon transform domain.
- Perform inverse mapping back to the offset domain to get the modeled NMO-corrected CMP gather d′(h, tn). During this inverse mapping, multiples, primaries, or all of the hyperbolic events can be modeled.
- Undo the moveout correction to get the modeled CMP gather d′(h, t).
As events on the NMO-corrected CMP gather deviate from the ideal parabolic form, there can be degradation in the ability to map those events into the Radon-transform domain (q, τ) [1]. Moreover, stretch muting that is normally required after NMO correction can remove the far-offset data significantly. The t2-stretching circumvents these shortcomings and replaces the moveout correction of the CMP gather. In practice, both hyperbolic and parabolic schemes in various forms are used to attenuate multiples.
Other equations
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
References
See also
- Velocity-stack transformation
- The discrete radon transform
- Practical considerations
- Impulse response of the velocity-stack operator
- Field data examples
- Radon-transform multiple attenuation