Here we follow standard texts, such as Spiegel (1964)[1] or Levinson and Redheffer (1970). [2]
In the computation of Fourier transform-like integrals as contour integrals, we often encounter the issue of the contribution of a semicircular contour that has infinite
radius.
Statement of Jordan's lemma
"Figure 1: contour of integration for Jordan's lemma"
Given a complex valued function
such that
as
. This means
that
as
becomes large. We require also that
be analytic at infinity in some half-plane of
we have the result that the integral over a semicircular contour in that half-plane vanishes
.
The quantity
is real valued, and finite.
Proof of Jordan's lemma
"Figure 2: the estimate of

for Jordan's lemma"
Following the hypothesis of the lemma we consider the following contour integral
.
If we let
and note by hypothesis that
on
, we have
,
where the last equality follows because the integrand is symmetric about the point
.
The function
on the interval
allowing the further estimate (see Figure 2)
.
The last integral may be solved by elementary means to yield
as
.
Though we have depicted the contour of integration in the upper half-plane of
, the result is actually general. The value of the parameter
takes on the appropriate sign as to make the exponential always decaying. So, a similar result exists for closure of the contour in the lower
half-plane of
, for Fourier-like integrals. Furthermore, for Laplace-like integrals we may consider closure in the right or left half-planes of the integration variable and obtain a similar result.
References
- ↑ Spiegel, Murray R. "Theory and problems of complex variables, with an introduction to Conformal Mapping and its applications." Schaum's outline series (1964).
- ↑ Levinson, Norman, and Raymond M. Redheffer. "Complex variables." (1970), Holden-Day, New York.