# Difference between revisions of "Wave velocity"

(Prepared the page for translation) |
(Marked this version for translation) |
||

Line 19: | Line 19: | ||

}} | }} | ||

<translate> | <translate> | ||

+ | <!--T:1--> | ||

Seismic velocity is the rate at which a seismic wave travels through a medium. Different methods are available for deriving velocity from the seismic data (Robinson, 1983<ref name=ch03r11>Robinson, E. A., 1983, Seismic velocity analysis and the convolutional model: Prentice-Hall and D. Reidel.</ref>). In addition to using laboratory measurements, we also can determine velocity from acoustic logs (Lindseth, 1979<ref name=ch03r6>Lindseth, R. O., 1979, Synthetic sonic logs –– A process for stratigraphic interpretation: Geophysics, '''44''', 3–26.</ref>), vertical seismic profiles (VSPs), or [[Special:MyLanguage/velocity analysis|velocity analysis]] of seismic data. Each method can give a different value of the velocity. For example, stacking velocity, which is derived from normal-moveout (NMO) data, is different from average velocity measured from a check shot. | Seismic velocity is the rate at which a seismic wave travels through a medium. Different methods are available for deriving velocity from the seismic data (Robinson, 1983<ref name=ch03r11>Robinson, E. A., 1983, Seismic velocity analysis and the convolutional model: Prentice-Hall and D. Reidel.</ref>). In addition to using laboratory measurements, we also can determine velocity from acoustic logs (Lindseth, 1979<ref name=ch03r6>Lindseth, R. O., 1979, Synthetic sonic logs –– A process for stratigraphic interpretation: Geophysics, '''44''', 3–26.</ref>), vertical seismic profiles (VSPs), or [[Special:MyLanguage/velocity analysis|velocity analysis]] of seismic data. Each method can give a different value of the velocity. For example, stacking velocity, which is derived from normal-moveout (NMO) data, is different from average velocity measured from a check shot. | ||

+ | <!--T:2--> | ||

In addition to their velocity, waves are characterized by their particle motion, amplitude, frequency, and wavelength. Velocity depends on the elastic properties and density of the medium. Elastic properties are determined by the medium’s incompressibility (or bulk modulus) and rigidity. Compressional velocity depends on both incompressibility and rigidity. Shear velocity depends only on rigidity. For all materials, the shear velocity is always less than the compressional velocity. | In addition to their velocity, waves are characterized by their particle motion, amplitude, frequency, and wavelength. Velocity depends on the elastic properties and density of the medium. Elastic properties are determined by the medium’s incompressibility (or bulk modulus) and rigidity. Compressional velocity depends on both incompressibility and rigidity. Shear velocity depends only on rigidity. For all materials, the shear velocity is always less than the compressional velocity. | ||

+ | <!--T:3--> | ||

What is Poisson’s ratio? Poisson’s ratio <math>\left(\sigma \right)</math> is the ratio of the lateral contraction of an elastic body to the longitudinal extension of that elastic body when it is stretched. Poisson’s ratio is an elastic constant that is useful in relating the velocities of the two types of waves: compressional waves and shear waves. | What is Poisson’s ratio? Poisson’s ratio <math>\left(\sigma \right)</math> is the ratio of the lateral contraction of an elastic body to the longitudinal extension of that elastic body when it is stretched. Poisson’s ratio is an elastic constant that is useful in relating the velocities of the two types of waves: compressional waves and shear waves. | ||

+ | <!--T:4--> | ||

The expression | The expression | ||

Line 31: | Line 35: | ||

\begin{align} | \begin{align} | ||

&V^{{\rm 2}} | &V^{{\rm 2}} | ||

− | <translate>_{{\rm S}}{\rm =}V^{{\rm 2}}_{{\rm P}}\frac{{\rm l}-{\rm 2}\sigma }{{\rm 2}\left({\rm l}-\sigma \right)} | + | <translate><!--T:5--> |

+ | _{{\rm S}}{\rm =}V^{{\rm 2}}_{{\rm P}}\frac{{\rm l}-{\rm 2}\sigma }{{\rm 2}\left({\rm l}-\sigma \right)} | ||

\end{align} | \end{align} | ||

</math>|{{EquationRef|1}}}} | </math>|{{EquationRef|1}}}} | ||

+ | <!--T:6--> | ||

is a relationship between the shear velocity, <math>V_{{\rm S}}</math>, and the compressional velocity, <math>V_{{\rm P}}</math>, in terms of Poisson’s ratio. In an ideal elastic solid, Poisson’s ratio equals 0.25, and <math>V_{{\rm S}}{\rm =}V_{{\rm P}}{\rm /}\sqrt{{\rm 3}}</math>. Steel is a good example of an ideal solid. Poisson ratios for rocks vary in the range of ~0.2 to ~0.4. The upper bound on Poisson’s ratio is 0.5. For that value, <math>V_{{\rm S}}</math> is zero, and there are no shear waves. That is the condition that holds for fluids and gases. | is a relationship between the shear velocity, <math>V_{{\rm S}}</math>, and the compressional velocity, <math>V_{{\rm P}}</math>, in terms of Poisson’s ratio. In an ideal elastic solid, Poisson’s ratio equals 0.25, and <math>V_{{\rm S}}{\rm =}V_{{\rm P}}{\rm /}\sqrt{{\rm 3}}</math>. Steel is a good example of an ideal solid. Poisson ratios for rocks vary in the range of ~0.2 to ~0.4. The upper bound on Poisson’s ratio is 0.5. For that value, <math>V_{{\rm S}}</math> is zero, and there are no shear waves. That is the condition that holds for fluids and gases. | ||

+ | <!--T:7--> | ||

Several features make rocks anisotropic. Anisotropy causes the average elastic constants to depend on direction. A common type of anisotropy is the result of fine layering. For example, the Austin Chalk has alternating hard and soft layers, each of which is only a few centimeters thick. For low-frequency seismic waves, the Austin Chalk can be described as a homogeneous but anisotropic medium. Its average properties depend on the contrast between layers. Another source of anisotropy is block fracturing. Such fracturing results from past episodes of tectonic movement. A third source of anisotropy is caused by unequal stress fields existing in the rock. | Several features make rocks anisotropic. Anisotropy causes the average elastic constants to depend on direction. A common type of anisotropy is the result of fine layering. For example, the Austin Chalk has alternating hard and soft layers, each of which is only a few centimeters thick. For low-frequency seismic waves, the Austin Chalk can be described as a homogeneous but anisotropic medium. Its average properties depend on the contrast between layers. Another source of anisotropy is block fracturing. Such fracturing results from past episodes of tectonic movement. A third source of anisotropy is caused by unequal stress fields existing in the rock. | ||

+ | <!--T:8--> | ||

In an anisotropic medium, the velocities of compressional and shear waves depend on the direction of propagation. In an anisotropic layered medium, compressional waves generally have a velocity higher in the direction parallel to the layering than in the direction perpendicular to the layering. Two types of shear waves propagate in the direction of the layering. One type is the SV wave, which has particle motion perpendicular to the layering. The other type is the SH wave, which has particle motion parallel to the layering. | In an anisotropic medium, the velocities of compressional and shear waves depend on the direction of propagation. In an anisotropic layered medium, compressional waves generally have a velocity higher in the direction parallel to the layering than in the direction perpendicular to the layering. Two types of shear waves propagate in the direction of the layering. One type is the SV wave, which has particle motion perpendicular to the layering. The other type is the SH wave, which has particle motion parallel to the layering. | ||

__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||

− | ==References== | + | ==References== <!--T:9--> |

</translate> | </translate> | ||

Line 48: | Line 56: | ||

<translate> | <translate> | ||

− | == Continue reading == | + | == Continue reading == <!--T:10--> |

+ | <!--T:11--> | ||

{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" align="center" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" align="center" | ||

|- | |- | ||

Line 69: | Line 78: | ||

− | == Also in this chapter == | + | == Also in this chapter == <!--T:12--> |

+ | <!--T:13--> | ||

* [[Special:MyLanguage/The seismic reflection method|The seismic reflection method]] | * [[Special:MyLanguage/The seismic reflection method|The seismic reflection method]] | ||

* [[Special:MyLanguage/Seismic interpretation - book|Seismic interpretation]] | * [[Special:MyLanguage/Seismic interpretation - book|Seismic interpretation]] | ||

Line 83: | Line 93: | ||

− | == External links == | + | == External links == <!--T:14--> |

</translate> | </translate> | ||

Line 89: | Line 99: | ||

<translate> | <translate> | ||

+ | <!--T:15--> | ||

[[Category:Digital Imaging and Deconvolution]] | [[Category:Digital Imaging and Deconvolution]] | ||

[[Category:Publications]] | [[Category:Publications]] | ||

[[Category:Visualization]] | [[Category:Visualization]] | ||

</translate> | </translate> |

## Latest revision as of 13:42, 30 April 2021

Series | Geophysical References Series |
---|---|

Title | Digital Imaging and Deconvolution: The ABCs of Seismic Exploration and Processing |

Author | Enders A. Robinson and Sven Treitel |

Chapter | 3 |

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560801610 |

ISBN | 9781560801481 |

Store | SEG Online Store |

Seismic velocity is the rate at which a seismic wave travels through a medium. Different methods are available for deriving velocity from the seismic data (Robinson, 1983^{[1]}). In addition to using laboratory measurements, we also can determine velocity from acoustic logs (Lindseth, 1979^{[2]}), vertical seismic profiles (VSPs), or velocity analysis of seismic data. Each method can give a different value of the velocity. For example, stacking velocity, which is derived from normal-moveout (NMO) data, is different from average velocity measured from a check shot.

In addition to their velocity, waves are characterized by their particle motion, amplitude, frequency, and wavelength. Velocity depends on the elastic properties and density of the medium. Elastic properties are determined by the medium’s incompressibility (or bulk modulus) and rigidity. Compressional velocity depends on both incompressibility and rigidity. Shear velocity depends only on rigidity. For all materials, the shear velocity is always less than the compressional velocity.

What is Poisson’s ratio? Poisson’s ratio is the ratio of the lateral contraction of an elastic body to the longitudinal extension of that elastic body when it is stretched. Poisson’s ratio is an elastic constant that is useful in relating the velocities of the two types of waves: compressional waves and shear waves.

The expression

**(**)

is a relationship between the shear velocity, , and the compressional velocity, , in terms of Poisson’s ratio. In an ideal elastic solid, Poisson’s ratio equals 0.25, and . Steel is a good example of an ideal solid. Poisson ratios for rocks vary in the range of ~0.2 to ~0.4. The upper bound on Poisson’s ratio is 0.5. For that value, is zero, and there are no shear waves. That is the condition that holds for fluids and gases.

Several features make rocks anisotropic. Anisotropy causes the average elastic constants to depend on direction. A common type of anisotropy is the result of fine layering. For example, the Austin Chalk has alternating hard and soft layers, each of which is only a few centimeters thick. For low-frequency seismic waves, the Austin Chalk can be described as a homogeneous but anisotropic medium. Its average properties depend on the contrast between layers. Another source of anisotropy is block fracturing. Such fracturing results from past episodes of tectonic movement. A third source of anisotropy is caused by unequal stress fields existing in the rock.

In an anisotropic medium, the velocities of compressional and shear waves depend on the direction of propagation. In an anisotropic layered medium, compressional waves generally have a velocity higher in the direction parallel to the layering than in the direction perpendicular to the layering. Two types of shear waves propagate in the direction of the layering. One type is the SV wave, which has particle motion perpendicular to the layering. The other type is the SH wave, which has particle motion parallel to the layering.

## References

## Continue reading

Previous section | Next section |
---|---|

The wave equation | Velocity analysis |

Previous chapter | Next chapter |

Digital Imaging | Sampling |

## Also in this chapter

- The seismic reflection method
- Seismic interpretation
- Porosity
- Absorption loss and transmission loss
- The wave equation
- Velocity analysis
- Seismic tomography
- Coherence
- Appendix C: Exercises