The plus-minus method

ADVERTISEMENT
From SEG Wiki
Revision as of 16:58, 7 October 2014 by Ageary (talk | contribs) (added links)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Seismic Data Analysis
Seismic-data-analysis.jpg
Series Investigations in Geophysics
Author Öz Yilmaz
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560801580
ISBN ISBN 978-1-56080-094-1
Store SEG Online Store


It often is difficult to use first breaks to estimate the intercept time and velocities for the weathering layer and bedrock. This is primarily because the base of weathering typically is an undulating surface, which makes traveltime plots difficult to interpret. Traveltime plots also are affected by severe elevation changes. Additionally, a typical field cable layout does not provide a sufficient number of channels inside the crossover distance xc (Figure 3.4-11a) for a reliable estimate of the weathering velocity or thickness. In most cases, vw cannot be measured and a reasonable value is assumed for it.

[1] formulated a method to indirectly estimate intercept time and bedrock velocity. The method still requires picking the first breaks. However, it does not require interpreting the traveltime profile (Figure 3.4-11a). (Interpretation means drawing the linear segments for the direct and refracted waves.) Figure 3.4-12a shows three raypaths associated with shot-receiver pairs AD, DG, and AG. The basis of Hage-doorn’s method involves computing two time values, the plus and minus times given by


(47a)

and


(47b)

The times given on the right side of these equations are the measured (picked) values from the first breaks for the three raypaths shown in Figure 3.4-12a. From the raypath configuration, we find that (Section C.7)


(48a)

Rewrite equation (41a)


(41a)


(48b)

and note that the plus time t+ in equation (48a) is identical to the intercept time ti in equation (48b). Hence, instead of measuring ti directly from the shot record, Hagedoorn’s method suggests estimating ti from the first break picks given by the right-hand terms in equation (47a).

By applying algebra (Section C.7), we find that minus time t is related to bedrock velocity vb by


(48c)

where x is the source-receiver separation AD.

Thus, Hagedoorn’s plus-minus method involves:

  1. Picking the first breaks,
  2. Computing the plus-minus times, t and t+ (equations 47a and 47b),
  3. Deriving from the plus-minus times the intercept time ti (equations 48a and 48b) and bedrock velocity vb (equation 48c),
  4. Assuming a value for weathering velocity vw,
  5. Computing the depth zD to bedrock below station D (Figure 3.4-12a) from equation (41a), and
  6. Computing the shot-receiver static shift ΔτD at that station by


(49)

where ES and ED are the surface and datum elevations at station D (Figure 3.4-12a). If there is a shot at station D, ΔτD represents the shot static, and if there is a receiver at station D, it represents the receiver static. Again, uphole and elevation corrections are needed before making the plus-minus statics corrections.

See also

References

  1. Hagedoorn (1959), Hagedoorn, J. G., 1959, The plus-minus method of interpreting seismic refraction sections: Geophys. Prosp., 7, 158–182.

External links

find literature about
The plus-minus method
SEG button search.png Datapages button.png GeoScienceWorld button.png OnePetro button.png Schlumberger button.png Google button.png AGI button.png