Summation strategies

ADVERTISEMENT
From SEG Wiki
Revision as of 08:07, 2 October 2014 by Ageary (talk | contribs) (fixed image)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Seismic Data Analysis
Seismic-data-analysis.jpg
Series Investigations in Geophysics
Author Öz Yilmaz
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560801580
ISBN ISBN 978-1-56080-094-1
Store SEG Online Store


Figure 8.5-10 shows the zero-offset wavefield responses of a point diffractor buried in media with varying degrees of complexity. The traveltime trajectories associated with the point diffractors buried in a constant-velocity medium, beneath an overburden with mild to moderate lateral velocity variations, and beneath an overburden with strong lateral velocity variations, all are single-valued. Therefore, ray tracing through such models would produce unambiguous traveltimes for Kirchhoff summation.

Figure 8.5-10  Zero-offset wavefield responses of a point diffractor buried in (a) a constant-velocity medium, (b) beneath an overburden with mild to moderate lateral velocity variations, (c) beneath an overburden with strong lateral velocity variations, and (d) beneath a complex overburden with severe lateral velocity variations.

The zero-offset traveltime trajectory associated with the point diffractor buried beneath an overburden with severe lateral velocity variations, however, is multivalued (Figures 8.5-10d). One would have to decide as to what summation path to choose:

  1. The travelpath that corresponds to the first arrivals; that is, minimum-time summation trajectory [1] [2],
  2. The travelpath that corresponds to the bowties that contain the most significant portion of the energy associated with the zero-offset wavefield response; that is, maximum-energy summation trajectory [3],
  3. The travelpath that corresponds to the shortest distance between the source or receiver point at the surface and the reflection point at the subsurface; that is, minimum-distance summation trajectory [4], or
  4. The entire multivalued travelpath.

From the zero-offset wavefields associated with a diffractor buried in a medium with varying complexity shown in Figure 8.5-10, it can be inferred that the minimum-time strategy may be suitable for cases of moderate to strong lateral velocity variations (Figure 8.5-10b,c), whereas the maximum-energy strategy may be imperative for a case of a complex overburden with severe lateral velocity variations (Figure 8.5-10d). Ideally, it would be desirable not to exclude any portion of the traveltime trajectory and use a multivalued summation path. This, however, can be formidably costly and often is not needed in practice. Efficient traveltime calculation and choice of a summation path are important considerations for the 3-D prestack depth migration of large volumes of seismic data [5] [6].

References

  1. Vidale, 1988, Vidale, J., 1988, Finite-difference calculation of traveltimes: Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 78, 2026–2076.
  2. Podvin and Lecomte, 1991, Podvin, P. and Lecomte, I., 1991, Finite-difference computation of traveltimes for velocity-depth models with strong velocity contrast across layer boundaries — a massively parallel approach: Geophys. J. Int., 105, 271–284.
  3. Nichols, 1996, Nichols, D. E., 1996, Maximum-energy traveltimes calculated in the seismic frequency band: Geophysics, 61, 253–263.
  4. Moser, 1991, Moser, T. J., 1991, Shortest-path calculation of seismic rays: Geophysics, 56, 59–67.
  5. Meshbey et al., 1993, Meshbey, V., Kosloff, D., Ragoza, Y., Meshbey, O., Egozy, U., and Cozzens, J., 1993, A method for computing traveltimes for an arbitrary velocity model: Presented at the 45th Ann. EAGE Mtg.
  6. Sethian and Popovici, 1999, Sethian, J. A. and Popovici, A. M., 1999, 3-D traveltime computation using the fast marching method: Geophysics, 64, 516–523.

See also

External links

find literature about
Summation strategies
SEG button search.png Datapages button.png GeoScienceWorld button.png OnePetro button.png Schlumberger button.png Google button.png AGI button.png