Search results

Jump to: navigation, search

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • ...the same as the constant vector <math> w_j </math> defined in the previous discussion. This
    12 KB (2,058 words) - 12:26, 26 October 2017
  • discussion of these conventions.
    11 KB (1,757 words) - 06:57, 15 June 2017
  • As in the previous discussion, we deform the contour of integration to create a real-valued integral alo
    15 KB (2,476 words) - 13:44, 12 September 2018
  • ...aul A. M. Dirac, but the necessity of such an object was alluded to in the discussion of
    5 KB (838 words) - 10:49, 16 March 2020
  • ...a frame of reference. Restrictions on meaning sometimes are contained in a discussion which follows rather than being incorporated into the definition itself. Te
    4 KB (551 words) - 15:56, 8 February 2012
  • Denham, L. R. and Palmeira, R. A. R., 1984, Discussion on reflection and transmission of plane compressional waves: Geophysics, 49
    40 KB (5,282 words) - 17:45, 23 February 2016
  • ...y:time-distance_curve_(T-X_curve)|''time-distance curves'']] (q.v.). For a discussion of the factors affecting seismic velocity, see Sheriff and Geldart (1995, 1
    3 KB (495 words) - 04:03, 7 June 2017
  • Carl wandered out to participate in the discussion (as he was
    17 KB (2,848 words) - 11:38, 23 February 2015
  • In this period he had the opportunity to experience a discussion on Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift, where a famous geologist s
    12 KB (1,798 words) - 14:02, 28 December 2016
  • *{{cite journal|last1=Anstey|first1=Nigel|title=Stack‐array discussion continues|journal=The Leading Edge|volume=8|issue=3|year=1989|pages=24–31
    16 KB (2,345 words) - 11:23, 31 August 2020
  • ...since his papers were always sufficiently controversial to elicit critical discussion. He introduced many novel features in his papers which added to their inter discussion. He introduced many novel features in his papers which added to
    21 KB (3,414 words) - 13:55, 10 September 2014
  • raising awareness to in-depth discussion. Other societies—like SPE
    8 KB (1,324 words) - 17:13, 8 April 2015
  • ...larger the field required, and one soon gets to a point of no return. For discussion purposes let us first define an "elephant" as a 100 million-barrel oil or g
    31 KB (5,164 words) - 13:55, 17 October 2016
  • ...icists, publishing numerous papers during this time and participated in in discussion groups and supported SEG by his contributions to several other committees.
    2 KB (278 words) - 15:32, 14 April 2017
  • Dave is currently an associate professor of geophysics at Mines, but no discussion of Dave can be considered complete without mention of the support he has re
    8 KB (1,341 words) - 14:15, 20 October 2017
  • ...e founding of Hampson-Russell Software Services Ltd. in 1987. I remember a discussion about the company name. There was a suggestion that it was too long. But Da
    11 KB (1,735 words) - 21:05, 11 August 2016
  • ...nd who can be counted on to contribute more than his share of ideas to any discussion.
    6 KB (884 words) - 17:18, 4 November 2016
  • ...ts to the few inadequate sentences written here, but even several pages of discussion of these alone would leave unsaid something very important: Lucien's intell
    14 KB (2,178 words) - 21:39, 25 November 2020
  • ...e research originator. In 1965 Norman was already an expert in stimulating discussion, a unique quality that has since been evidenced numerous times at SEG techn ...e interest and attention to this important topic and have promoted healthy discussion from which the geophysical profession must ultimately gain. It is only rece
    4 KB (664 words) - 10:07, 25 September 2017
  • ...example, while teaching a graduate geophysics class, he began an animated discussion of Viktor E. Frankl’s foundational text Man’s Search for Meaning. Stude
    11 KB (1,718 words) - 17:29, 4 November 2016

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)