Search results

Jump to: navigation, search
Results 1 – 51 of 171
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • ...material published elsewhere may legally be posted to the SEG Wiki, and a discussion could shed light on the reality. If you think the situation requires more d
    8 KB (1,254 words) - 14:11, 3 May 2016
  • ...the same as the constant vector <math> w_j </math> defined in the previous discussion. This
    12 KB (2,058 words) - 12:26, 26 October 2017
  • discussion of these conventions.
    11 KB (1,757 words) - 06:57, 15 June 2017
  • As in the previous discussion, we deform the contour of integration to create a real-valued integral alo
    15 KB (2,476 words) - 13:44, 12 September 2018
  • ...aul A. M. Dirac, but the necessity of such an object was alluded to in the discussion of
    5 KB (838 words) - 10:49, 16 March 2020
  • ...a frame of reference. Restrictions on meaning sometimes are contained in a discussion which follows rather than being incorporated into the definition itself. Te
    4 KB (551 words) - 15:56, 8 February 2012
  • Denham, L. R. and Palmeira, R. A. R., 1984, Discussion on reflection and transmission of plane compressional waves: Geophysics, 49
    40 KB (5,282 words) - 17:45, 23 February 2016
  • ...y:time-distance_curve_(T-X_curve)|''time-distance curves'']] (q.v.). For a discussion of the factors affecting seismic velocity, see Sheriff and Geldart (1995, 1
    3 KB (495 words) - 04:03, 7 June 2017
  • Carl wandered out to participate in the discussion (as he was
    17 KB (2,848 words) - 11:38, 23 February 2015
  • In this period he had the opportunity to experience a discussion on Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift, where a famous geologist s
    12 KB (1,798 words) - 14:02, 28 December 2016
  • *{{cite journal|last1=Anstey|first1=Nigel|title=Stack‐array discussion continues|journal=The Leading Edge|volume=8|issue=3|year=1989|pages=24–31
    16 KB (2,345 words) - 11:23, 31 August 2020
  • ...since his papers were always sufficiently controversial to elicit critical discussion. He introduced many novel features in his papers which added to their inter discussion. He introduced many novel features in his papers which added to
    21 KB (3,414 words) - 13:55, 10 September 2014
  • raising awareness to in-depth discussion. Other societies—like SPE
    8 KB (1,324 words) - 17:13, 8 April 2015
  • ...larger the field required, and one soon gets to a point of no return. For discussion purposes let us first define an "elephant" as a 100 million-barrel oil or g
    31 KB (5,164 words) - 13:55, 17 October 2016
  • ...icists, publishing numerous papers during this time and participated in in discussion groups and supported SEG by his contributions to several other committees.
    2 KB (278 words) - 15:32, 14 April 2017
  • Dave is currently an associate professor of geophysics at Mines, but no discussion of Dave can be considered complete without mention of the support he has re
    8 KB (1,341 words) - 14:15, 20 October 2017
  • ...e founding of Hampson-Russell Software Services Ltd. in 1987. I remember a discussion about the company name. There was a suggestion that it was too long. But Da
    11 KB (1,735 words) - 21:05, 11 August 2016
  • ...nd who can be counted on to contribute more than his share of ideas to any discussion.
    6 KB (884 words) - 17:18, 4 November 2016
  • ...ts to the few inadequate sentences written here, but even several pages of discussion of these alone would leave unsaid something very important: Lucien's intell
    14 KB (2,178 words) - 21:39, 25 November 2020
  • ...e research originator. In 1965 Norman was already an expert in stimulating discussion, a unique quality that has since been evidenced numerous times at SEG techn ...e interest and attention to this important topic and have promoted healthy discussion from which the geophysical profession must ultimately gain. It is only rece
    4 KB (664 words) - 10:07, 25 September 2017
  • ...example, while teaching a graduate geophysics class, he began an animated discussion of Viktor E. Frankl’s foundational text Man’s Search for Meaning. Stude
    11 KB (1,718 words) - 17:29, 4 November 2016
  • ...ation to exploration geophysics through insightful and inclusive technical discussion.
    4 KB (570 words) - 11:36, 18 October 2016
  • ...intained. It’s common for Mike to enjoy a leisurely dinner and technical discussion with his course participants and then to work to 3 a.m. preparing notes for
    9 KB (1,396 words) - 09:58, 9 April 2015
  • mainstream geophysics, prior to a discussion with Don
    5 KB (771 words) - 11:57, 18 October 2016
  • ...utions of geophysicists of the past and present. The SEG Wiki adds to this discussion and helps provide many of these answers.
    7 KB (1,058 words) - 10:37, 14 July 2021
  • the project under discussion. Survived by his wife, two daughters, and a son,
    2 KB (291 words) - 19:49, 5 March 2014
  • ...to make suggestions and use the [[Talk:Wikithon_2014_at_SEG_Annual_Meeting|discussion tab]] within this page to define what YOU would like to learn during the 20
    11 KB (1,645 words) - 13:37, 23 September 2015
  • ...material published elsewhere may legally be posted to the SEG Wiki, and a discussion could shed light on the reality. If you think the situation requires more d
    9 KB (1,457 words) - 11:22, 12 March 2015
  • ...minimum-phase spectrum from a given amplitude spectrum is included in the discussion on [[Mathematical foundation of deconvolution#B.4 Frequency-domain deconvol
    8 KB (1,156 words) - 17:21, 7 October 2014
  • ...e and (c) gentle slope help eliminate the ripples. Refer to the text for a discussion of corner frequencies A, B, C, and D.
    6 KB (934 words) - 14:59, 28 August 2014
  • ...h 12-Hz frequency, but with dips that vary from 0 to 15 ms/trace. From the discussion on [[the 1-D Fourier transform]], we know about frequency, particularly ''t To continue this discussion, we will map these sections to the plane of temporal frequency versus spati
    7 KB (1,055 words) - 14:02, 17 September 2014
  • ...…). Finally, a mixed-phase wavelet does not have a stable inverse. This discussion leads us to assumption 7.
    17 KB (2,328 words) - 16:20, 17 September 2014
  • From the discussion so far, we see that the spiking deconvolution operator is the inverse of th The following concise discussion of optimum Wiener filters is based on <ref name=ch02r15>Robinson and Treite
    59 KB (9,331 words) - 17:26, 7 October 2014
  • ...meeting is typically a 20 minute presentation followed by 20-30 minutes of discussion. The upcoming location, topic and speaker is announced approximately 2-3 w
    7 KB (1,107 words) - 16:21, 2 April 2015
  • ...iffractions off the edges of reflector ''CD'' are excluded to simplify the discussion.
    14 KB (2,131 words) - 13:40, 19 September 2014
  • What was determined from a physical point of view in the preceding discussion can be rigorously described by the integral solution to the scalar wave equ
    10 KB (1,461 words) - 07:59, 2 October 2014
  • ...ng implicit and explicit schemes. In this section, we shall include in our discussion the 15-degree finite-difference algorithm because of its historical signifi
    7 KB (981 words) - 16:38, 9 February 2017
  • We now return to the more mathematical discussion and consider the stratified earth with a velocity ''v''(''z''). Since we ha
    72 KB (11,166 words) - 13:37, 29 November 2017
  • ...e and (c) gentle slope help eliminate the ripples. Refer to the text for a discussion of corner frequencies A, B, C, and D.]]
    28 KB (4,338 words) - 14:20, 23 September 2014
  • ...additional spatial extent that is required by [[migration]]. (Refer to the discussion on Figure 4.1-1.) This is especially important in 3-D surveys in which the
    6 KB (926 words) - 14:26, 23 September 2014
  • The preceding discussion was based on a constant-velocity assumption. To be of practical use, DMO mu
    6 KB (928 words) - 16:24, 23 September 2014
  • ...nd multiple attenuation#F.4 Free-surface multiple attenuation|mathematical discussion]].
    3 KB (334 words) - 10:36, 26 September 2014
  • ...s down from left to right (see, for instance, crossline X-200). Recall the discussion on [[migration and line length]] ([[further aspects of migration in practic
    7 KB (1,056 words) - 17:27, 30 September 2014
  • ...nsions: Geophysics, 43, 49–76.</ref> who provides a detailed theoretical discussion on 3-D [[Kirchhoff migration]] with some [[field data examples]].
    7 KB (972 words) - 15:15, 9 October 2014
  • ...such, it implies earth modeling in depth. We shall therefore refer to the discussion on [[time-to-depth conversion]] and calibration of the results of depth con
    8 KB (1,242 words) - 11:48, 1 October 2014
  • We continue our discussion with the salt diapir model data. Figure 8.2-6 shows time and depth [[migrat
    8 KB (1,218 words) - 14:13, 1 October 2014
  • We shall extend the discussion on shot-geophone migration by comparing prestack depth [[migration]] with p We now complete our discussion on shot-geophone migration by examining the effect of missing data on imagi
    10 KB (1,497 words) - 14:48, 1 October 2014
  • ...ex overburden above horizon 8. See [[2-D poststack depth migration]] for a discussion on image rays.
    12 KB (1,781 words) - 16:46, 9 October 2014
  • A comprehensive mathematical discussion on image-ray tracing is given by Hubral and Krey <ref name=ch09r12>Hubral a
    8 KB (1,358 words) - 12:00, 2 October 2014
  • ...formance of the method with [[model experiments]]. We shall complement the discussion on tomography with a field data example.
    18 KB (2,793 words) - 17:14, 9 October 2014

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)