Search results

Jump to: navigation, search
Results 1 – 101 of 171
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • ...material published elsewhere may legally be posted to the SEG Wiki, and a discussion could shed light on the reality. If you think the situation requires more d
    8 KB (1,254 words) - 14:11, 3 May 2016
  • ...the same as the constant vector <math> w_j </math> defined in the previous discussion. This
    12 KB (2,058 words) - 12:26, 26 October 2017
  • discussion of these conventions.
    11 KB (1,757 words) - 06:57, 15 June 2017
  • As in the previous discussion, we deform the contour of integration to create a real-valued integral alo
    15 KB (2,476 words) - 13:44, 12 September 2018
  • ...aul A. M. Dirac, but the necessity of such an object was alluded to in the discussion of
    5 KB (838 words) - 10:49, 16 March 2020
  • ...a frame of reference. Restrictions on meaning sometimes are contained in a discussion which follows rather than being incorporated into the definition itself. Te
    4 KB (551 words) - 15:56, 8 February 2012
  • Denham, L. R. and Palmeira, R. A. R., 1984, Discussion on reflection and transmission of plane compressional waves: Geophysics, 49
    40 KB (5,282 words) - 17:45, 23 February 2016
  • ...y:time-distance_curve_(T-X_curve)|''time-distance curves'']] (q.v.). For a discussion of the factors affecting seismic velocity, see Sheriff and Geldart (1995, 1
    3 KB (495 words) - 04:03, 7 June 2017
  • Carl wandered out to participate in the discussion (as he was
    17 KB (2,848 words) - 11:38, 23 February 2015
  • In this period he had the opportunity to experience a discussion on Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift, where a famous geologist s
    12 KB (1,798 words) - 14:02, 28 December 2016
  • *{{cite journal|last1=Anstey|first1=Nigel|title=Stack‐array discussion continues|journal=The Leading Edge|volume=8|issue=3|year=1989|pages=24–31
    16 KB (2,345 words) - 11:23, 31 August 2020
  • ...since his papers were always sufficiently controversial to elicit critical discussion. He introduced many novel features in his papers which added to their inter discussion. He introduced many novel features in his papers which added to
    21 KB (3,414 words) - 13:55, 10 September 2014
  • raising awareness to in-depth discussion. Other societies—like SPE
    8 KB (1,324 words) - 17:13, 8 April 2015
  • ...larger the field required, and one soon gets to a point of no return. For discussion purposes let us first define an "elephant" as a 100 million-barrel oil or g
    31 KB (5,164 words) - 13:55, 17 October 2016
  • ...icists, publishing numerous papers during this time and participated in in discussion groups and supported SEG by his contributions to several other committees.
    2 KB (278 words) - 15:32, 14 April 2017
  • Dave is currently an associate professor of geophysics at Mines, but no discussion of Dave can be considered complete without mention of the support he has re
    8 KB (1,341 words) - 14:15, 20 October 2017
  • ...e founding of Hampson-Russell Software Services Ltd. in 1987. I remember a discussion about the company name. There was a suggestion that it was too long. But Da
    11 KB (1,735 words) - 21:05, 11 August 2016
  • ...nd who can be counted on to contribute more than his share of ideas to any discussion.
    6 KB (884 words) - 17:18, 4 November 2016
  • ...ts to the few inadequate sentences written here, but even several pages of discussion of these alone would leave unsaid something very important: Lucien's intell
    14 KB (2,178 words) - 21:39, 25 November 2020
  • ...e research originator. In 1965 Norman was already an expert in stimulating discussion, a unique quality that has since been evidenced numerous times at SEG techn ...e interest and attention to this important topic and have promoted healthy discussion from which the geophysical profession must ultimately gain. It is only rece
    4 KB (664 words) - 10:07, 25 September 2017
  • ...example, while teaching a graduate geophysics class, he began an animated discussion of Viktor E. Frankl’s foundational text Man’s Search for Meaning. Stude
    11 KB (1,718 words) - 17:29, 4 November 2016
  • ...ation to exploration geophysics through insightful and inclusive technical discussion.
    4 KB (570 words) - 11:36, 18 October 2016
  • ...intained. It’s common for Mike to enjoy a leisurely dinner and technical discussion with his course participants and then to work to 3 a.m. preparing notes for
    9 KB (1,396 words) - 09:58, 9 April 2015
  • mainstream geophysics, prior to a discussion with Don
    5 KB (771 words) - 11:57, 18 October 2016
  • ...utions of geophysicists of the past and present. The SEG Wiki adds to this discussion and helps provide many of these answers.
    7 KB (1,058 words) - 10:37, 14 July 2021
  • the project under discussion. Survived by his wife, two daughters, and a son,
    2 KB (291 words) - 19:49, 5 March 2014
  • ...to make suggestions and use the [[Talk:Wikithon_2014_at_SEG_Annual_Meeting|discussion tab]] within this page to define what YOU would like to learn during the 20
    11 KB (1,645 words) - 13:37, 23 September 2015
  • ...material published elsewhere may legally be posted to the SEG Wiki, and a discussion could shed light on the reality. If you think the situation requires more d
    9 KB (1,457 words) - 11:22, 12 March 2015
  • ...minimum-phase spectrum from a given amplitude spectrum is included in the discussion on [[Mathematical foundation of deconvolution#B.4 Frequency-domain deconvol
    8 KB (1,156 words) - 17:21, 7 October 2014
  • ...e and (c) gentle slope help eliminate the ripples. Refer to the text for a discussion of corner frequencies A, B, C, and D.
    6 KB (934 words) - 14:59, 28 August 2014
  • ...h 12-Hz frequency, but with dips that vary from 0 to 15 ms/trace. From the discussion on [[the 1-D Fourier transform]], we know about frequency, particularly ''t To continue this discussion, we will map these sections to the plane of temporal frequency versus spati
    7 KB (1,055 words) - 14:02, 17 September 2014
  • ...…). Finally, a mixed-phase wavelet does not have a stable inverse. This discussion leads us to assumption 7.
    17 KB (2,328 words) - 16:20, 17 September 2014
  • From the discussion so far, we see that the spiking deconvolution operator is the inverse of th The following concise discussion of optimum Wiener filters is based on <ref name=ch02r15>Robinson and Treite
    59 KB (9,331 words) - 17:26, 7 October 2014
  • ...meeting is typically a 20 minute presentation followed by 20-30 minutes of discussion. The upcoming location, topic and speaker is announced approximately 2-3 w
    7 KB (1,107 words) - 16:21, 2 April 2015
  • ...iffractions off the edges of reflector ''CD'' are excluded to simplify the discussion.
    14 KB (2,131 words) - 13:40, 19 September 2014
  • What was determined from a physical point of view in the preceding discussion can be rigorously described by the integral solution to the scalar wave equ
    10 KB (1,461 words) - 07:59, 2 October 2014
  • ...ng implicit and explicit schemes. In this section, we shall include in our discussion the 15-degree finite-difference algorithm because of its historical signifi
    7 KB (981 words) - 16:38, 9 February 2017
  • We now return to the more mathematical discussion and consider the stratified earth with a velocity ''v''(''z''). Since we ha
    72 KB (11,166 words) - 13:37, 29 November 2017
  • ...e and (c) gentle slope help eliminate the ripples. Refer to the text for a discussion of corner frequencies A, B, C, and D.]]
    28 KB (4,338 words) - 14:20, 23 September 2014
  • ...additional spatial extent that is required by [[migration]]. (Refer to the discussion on Figure 4.1-1.) This is especially important in 3-D surveys in which the
    6 KB (926 words) - 14:26, 23 September 2014
  • The preceding discussion was based on a constant-velocity assumption. To be of practical use, DMO mu
    6 KB (928 words) - 16:24, 23 September 2014
  • ...nd multiple attenuation#F.4 Free-surface multiple attenuation|mathematical discussion]].
    3 KB (334 words) - 10:36, 26 September 2014
  • ...s down from left to right (see, for instance, crossline X-200). Recall the discussion on [[migration and line length]] ([[further aspects of migration in practic
    7 KB (1,056 words) - 17:27, 30 September 2014
  • ...nsions: Geophysics, 43, 49–76.</ref> who provides a detailed theoretical discussion on 3-D [[Kirchhoff migration]] with some [[field data examples]].
    7 KB (972 words) - 15:15, 9 October 2014
  • ...such, it implies earth modeling in depth. We shall therefore refer to the discussion on [[time-to-depth conversion]] and calibration of the results of depth con
    8 KB (1,242 words) - 11:48, 1 October 2014
  • We continue our discussion with the salt diapir model data. Figure 8.2-6 shows time and depth [[migrat
    8 KB (1,218 words) - 14:13, 1 October 2014
  • We shall extend the discussion on shot-geophone migration by comparing prestack depth [[migration]] with p We now complete our discussion on shot-geophone migration by examining the effect of missing data on imagi
    10 KB (1,497 words) - 14:48, 1 October 2014
  • ...ex overburden above horizon 8. See [[2-D poststack depth migration]] for a discussion on image rays.
    12 KB (1,781 words) - 16:46, 9 October 2014
  • A comprehensive mathematical discussion on image-ray tracing is given by Hubral and Krey <ref name=ch09r12>Hubral a
    8 KB (1,358 words) - 12:00, 2 October 2014
  • ...formance of the method with [[model experiments]]. We shall complement the discussion on tomography with a field data example.
    18 KB (2,793 words) - 17:14, 9 October 2014
  • ...zons H2-H6b, one layer at a time, starting at the top. For the sake of the discussion here, assume that the velocity-depth model for the first ''n'' − 1 layers
    6 KB (936 words) - 16:59, 2 October 2014
  • This chapter ends with a brief discussion on [[Dictionary:Anisotropy|anisotropy]]. While exploration seismology at la
    6 KB (828 words) - 10:31, 22 September 2014
  • To facilitate the forthcoming discussion on the link between elastic waves and rock properties, first, we summarize
    18 KB (2,723 words) - 16:28, 6 October 2014
  • We shall end the discussion on this case study by comparing the results of the three inversion procedur
    7 KB (1,002 words) - 17:13, 2 October 2014
  • From the above discussion, we see that peak-to-peak time measurements and amplitude information can a
    15 KB (2,198 words) - 16:36, 6 October 2014
  • The following discussion on [[reflection and refraction]] of seismic waves is based on flat layer bo
    4 KB (585 words) - 16:50, 6 October 2014
  • In the foregoing discussion, a normal-incident compressional plane wave was considered. If the same com
    19 KB (2,801 words) - 16:57, 6 October 2014
  • We shall confine the discussion on anisotropy primarily to the practical case of ''P''-wave propagation in
    14 KB (1,995 words) - 18:36, 9 October 2014
  • From the discussion on the convolutional model of a seismic trace in [[the convolutional model]
    6 KB (796 words) - 08:04, 7 October 2014
  • ...ly by students but also by our professors, which often results in a lively discussion. ...g a brief summary of the paper is given, then the paper is discussed. This discussion may include unfamiliar jargon and terminology to the concepts and the inten
    3 KB (462 words) - 12:14, 7 October 2020
  • * April 7, 2017 | SEG Wavelets WNC Panel Discussion | University of Houston | SR1, room 223
    11 KB (1,518 words) - 10:46, 15 October 2021
  • ...guished visitors come through Perth, we try to arrange a semi-private talk/discussion with the student chapter. <br>
    4 KB (544 words) - 09:30, 28 October 2020
  • ...al:Contributions/BD2412|c]])</small>; see [[Talk:Energy systems#reqmovetag|discussion]]<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Article alerts/Last update}} {{Wikipedia:Article al
    2 KB (313 words) - 11:21, 8 January 2015
  • ...an be one or the other, but not both (zero crossings are omitted from this discussion). If the waveform onset type does vary, as in this example, the unconformit
    6 KB (973 words) - 12:00, 26 March 2019
  • * Developing creativity of members by doing discussion to optimize the implementation of workplans. ...n Lampung. We facilitate for olympiad in the text test, practical test and discussion session. Also giving interest in studying earth science and the availabilit
    12 KB (1,793 words) - 02:52, 23 January 2022
  • ...rom burial depth or modeling lithologic rather than fluid changes. See the discussion on training data in Avseth et al., p. 126.<ref>Avseth, P., T. Mukerji, and
    11 KB (1,820 words) - 14:15, 2 June 2015
  • ...ater well contamination), use of groundwater, and groundwater measurement, discussion of groundwater and the water cycle, and links to USGS Groundwater data. ...ry and water quality), statistics on surface water use by various sectors, discussion of surface water and the water cycle, measuring surface water, links to sur
    3 KB (396 words) - 14:01, 16 June 2015
  • ...r plants, locations of geothermal energy, geothermal heat pumps, and brief discussion of geothermal energy and the environment.
    4 KB (550 words) - 09:15, 28 September 2015
  • :A basic discussion of the five commonly used renewable energy sources (biomass, hydropower, ge
    4 KB (623 words) - 13:42, 16 June 2015
  • ...neral"; discussion of why rare earth elements are "critical" minerals; and discussion of critical minerals that are not REE :A precise definition of rare earth elements (REEs) and in-depth discussion of how common REEs are, worldwide REE production, and current REE productio
    2 KB (312 words) - 10:10, 16 June 2015
  • ...s that can cause landslides, brief overview of where landslides occur, and discussion of why it is important to study landslides.
    4 KB (591 words) - 11:39, 16 June 2015
  • :In-depth discussion of tsunamis, their causes, and tsunami preparedness for a non-expert audien
    3 KB (429 words) - 13:46, 16 June 2015
  • == Discussion ==
    11 KB (1,632 words) - 14:24, 14 September 2019
  • ...8 000 in 1987; four geophysical sessions were offered plus a special panel discussion, "Seismic imaging of salt". The first EAEG-SEG joint research workshop unde ...James R. Wait elected president of the newly organized Ottawa Geophysical Discussion Club ... T. O. Hall elected president of General Geophysical Co. ... [[Wilf
    162 KB (23,950 words) - 11:27, 20 June 2016
  • ...revised edition of “The Origin of Continents and Oceans” appeared, and discussion began on his theory of continental drift, first in the German language area
    30 KB (4,484 words) - 17:50, 6 November 2015
  • ...t took place in Halliburton Training Center in Cairo. The visit included a discussion about drilling, in addition to an illustration of drilling tools.
    4 KB (550 words) - 18:11, 28 March 2017
  • To facilitate the discussion of data processing in practice, several processing "levels" were first defi
    18 KB (2,692 words) - 04:32, 28 April 2017
  • ==Discussion Leaders==
    4 KB (526 words) - 13:43, 30 June 2017
  • ...troduction. After viewing posters, all sessions reconvened for a panel-led discussion.
    9 KB (1,304 words) - 08:28, 18 April 2017
  • ...ciated wave propagator with run-time code generation. While we limited our discussion to the constant density acoustic wave equation, Devito is capable of handli
    18 KB (2,847 words) - 09:27, 26 February 2018
  • ...y:time-distance_curve_(T-X_curve)|''time-distance curves'']] (q.v.). For a discussion of the factors affecting seismic velocity, see Sheriff and Geldart (1995, 1
    3 KB (475 words) - 04:03, 7 June 2017
  • discussion of these conventions.
    10 KB (1,641 words) - 06:58, 15 June 2017
  • Presentations were given by industry experts in these areas and discussion sessions with the objective of building a bridge between the seismic model ...oir Model (Cory Hoelting, Session Chair). This session included papers and discussion on how seismic uncertainties are taken into account when building P10, P50,
    6 KB (825 words) - 13:44, 30 June 2017
  • ...ere was a strong emphasis on discussion and debate, facilitated by keynote discussion leaders, experts, academics, and practitioners.
    3 KB (364 words) - 13:48, 30 June 2017
  • ...oughout the workshop. Oral presentations complemented the poster sessions. Discussion sessions were lively and wide-ranging: the proportion of delegates that act
    3 KB (432 words) - 13:47, 30 June 2017
  • This workshop invited participants to contribute to the discussion of the status and prospects for the technique of FWI, and the current steps The workshop featured a mix of oral and poster presentations as well as discussion sessions.
    2 KB (344 words) - 13:41, 30 June 2017
  • ...ging, inversion, and interpretation. The workshop format emphasized active discussion and participation, and welcomed a forward-looking exchange of ideas as well ...nizers were eager to learn about successes, they also encouraged an honest discussion on failures. For this reason, the workshop included a closed-door session o
    3 KB (382 words) - 13:42, 30 June 2017
  • ...d seating to balance the presence of all the different players within each discussion group: geologists, geophysicists, petroleum and environmental engineers. Ch
    3 KB (468 words) - 13:46, 30 June 2017
  • As in the previous discussion, we deform the contour of integration to create a real-valued integral alo
    14 KB (2,308 words) - 15:05, 24 July 2017
  • ...describes the physical properties of the earth). Matt Hall kicked off the discussion of inversions in ''The Leading Edge'' in his [[Linear inversion|Linear Inve ...g., on the smoothness); these are knobs for another tutorial, and there is discussion in Oldenburg and Li (2005).<ref name=oldenburg />
    21 KB (3,355 words) - 10:04, 1 August 2017
  • There are a variety of coherence methods. A more detailed discussion of these methods can be found [[Semblance,_coherence,_and_other_discontinui
    5 KB (768 words) - 08:10, 6 September 2017
  • ...aul A. M. Dirac, but the necessity of such an object was alluded to in the discussion of
    5 KB (774 words) - 10:49, 16 March 2020
  • ...the same as the constant vector <math> w_j </math> defined in the previous discussion. This
    11 KB (1,874 words) - 09:32, 2 November 2017
  • ...pter has achieved its biggest and largest feat so far. From being merely a discussion in our SEG team to being executed in over 24 schools of Uttarakhand, intera
    31 KB (4,686 words) - 16:21, 28 February 2022
  • ...ent of FWI and what steps can be taken to ameliorate those challenges. The discussion should shed light on the question of when FWI can add value and what impact
    5 KB (686 words) - 12:05, 9 August 2019
  • ...rried out by giving a presentation on the field of geophysical science and discussion at the end of the event to increase the critical thinking of each problem,
    13 KB (1,854 words) - 06:26, 31 March 2020
  • This forum provided an open discussion on unconventional reservoirs with particular emphasis on shale gas developm
    1 KB (146 words) - 15:58, 29 December 2017
  • Panel Discussion – Session VII<br />
    3 KB (419 words) - 18:00, 28 December 2017
  • This forum provided an open discussion on carbonate reservoir characterization and monitoring.
    1 KB (178 words) - 10:38, 17 November 2020
  • The 5-day meeting in Beijing, China focused on an informal discussion of the geological, geophysical and engineering challenges in the developmen
    5 KB (670 words) - 16:31, 29 December 2017

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)