Difference between revisions of "Reflection/transmission coefficients at small angles and magnitude"

From SEG Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Also in this chapter: updated)
(Continue reading: updated)
Line 120: Line 120:
| align="center" | [[Amplitude/energy of reflections and multiples]]
| align="center" | [[Amplitude/energy of reflections and multiples]]
| align="center" | [[AVO versus AVA and effect of velocity gradient]]
| align="center" | [[Magnitude]]
! style="background: #426580; color: white;" | Previous chapter
! style="background: #426580; color: white;" | Previous chapter

Latest revision as of 10:18, 25 February 2019

Problem 3.9

Show that, when angles in the Zoeppritz equations (3.2e,f,h,i) are small (so that squares and products are negligible), equations (3.6a) and (3.6b) for reflection and transmission at normal incidence are still valid, and that the reflected and transmitted S-waves are given by

where , -


When the angle of incidence is small, and and the same is true for . In this case Snell’s law and the Zoeppritz equations (3.2e,f,h,i) become

In matrix notation, the Zoeppritz equations are now


To get the amplitude ratios and , we solve this equation either by inverting the left-hand matrix [see Sheriff and Geldart, 1995, equation (15.20)] or by using Cramer’s rule (see Wylie, 1966, 453). Using the latter method, and neglecting squares and products of the angles, we first calculate the value of det(), the determinant of the matrix in equation (3.9a). We shall expand by elements in the first row [see Sheriff and Geldart, 1995, equation (15.2)]; when we do this we see that the 2nd and 4th determinants in the expansion are multiplied by and , respectively, and since we are neglecting products and squares of angles, angles inside these two determinants have been replaced with zeros. The expansion about the first row becomes

Next we calculate the values of and , , 2, where is with column 1 replaced with the elements of the right-hand matrix in equation (3.9a), etc. (see Cramer’s rule in Sheriff and Geldart, 1995, problem 15.2j). Expanding about the first row and setting the angles in the 2nd and 4th determinant equal to zero as before, the expansion becomes

The second and fourth determinants are zero, so

Dividing by , we get

which is the same as equation (3.6a). Similarly, we find that

where , . Note that

Also, when

so q and

Continue reading

Previous section Next section
Amplitude/energy of reflections and multiples Magnitude
Previous chapter Next chapter
Theory of Seismic Waves Geometry of seismic waves

Table of Contents (book)

Also in this chapter

External links

find literature about
Reflection/transmission coefficients at small angles and magnitude
SEG button search.png Datapages button.png GeoScienceWorld button.png OnePetro button.png Schlumberger button.png Google button.png AGI button.png