Difference between revisions of "Model verification"

From SEG Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(added page)
 
(added images)
 
Line 20: Line 20:
 
# For an earth model in depth to be an acceptable representation of the subsurface geological model, it must be consistent with the seismic data used to estimate the model in question. To check for consistency, perform ray-theoretical modeling of zero-offset traveltimes associated with the layer boundaries included in the model (Figure 10.1-14). Then, superimpose the modeled traveltimes on the CMP-stacked section and observe any discrepancy between the modeled and the actual traveltimes (Figure 10.1-15). Here, we are assuming that the reflection traveltimes observed on a CMP-stacked section can be closely approximated by two-way ''zero-offset'' traveltimes. Actual traveltimes interpreted from the unmigrated CMP-stacked section are shown in Figure 10.1-3.
 
# For an earth model in depth to be an acceptable representation of the subsurface geological model, it must be consistent with the seismic data used to estimate the model in question. To check for consistency, perform ray-theoretical modeling of zero-offset traveltimes associated with the layer boundaries included in the model (Figure 10.1-14). Then, superimpose the modeled traveltimes on the CMP-stacked section and observe any discrepancy between the modeled and the actual traveltimes (Figure 10.1-15). Here, we are assuming that the reflection traveltimes observed on a CMP-stacked section can be closely approximated by two-way ''zero-offset'' traveltimes. Actual traveltimes interpreted from the unmigrated CMP-stacked section are shown in Figure 10.1-3.
  
<gallery>file:ch10_fig1-4.png|{{figure number|10.1-4}} The Southern Gas Basin line: four different velocity-depth models with the same overburden down to the top-Zechstein boundary, but with different constant velocities assigned to the half-space below — 4100, 4400, 4700, and 5000 m/s.
+
<gallery>
file:ch10_fig1-5.png|{{figure number|10.1-5}} The Southern Gas Basin line: selected image gathers from the left-half of the line as in Figure 10.1-1 from prestack depth [[migration]] using the four different earth models in Figure 10.1-4. See text for details.
 
file:ch10_fig1-6.png|{{figure number|10.1-6}} The Southern Gas Basin line: selected image gathers from the right-half of the line as in Figure 10.1-2 from prestack depth [[migration]] using the four different earth models in Figure 10.1-4. See text for details.
 
file:ch10_fig1-7.png|{{figure number|10.1-7}} The Southern Gas Basin line: depth images from prestack depth [[migration]] for the left-half of the line as in Figure 10.1-1 using the four different earth models in Figure 10.1-4. See text for details.
 
file:ch10_fig1-8.png|{{figure number|10.1-8}} The Southern Gas Basin line: depth images from prestack depth [[migration]] for the right-half of the line as in Figure 10.1-1 using the four different earth models in Figure 10.1-4. See text for details.
 
file:ch10_fig1-9.png|{{figure number|10.1-9}} The Southern Gas Basin line: final velocity-depth model.
 
 
file:ch10_fig1-10.png|{{figure number|10.1-10}} The Southern Gas Basin line: (a) selected image gathers from the left-half of the line as in Figure 10.1-1 from prestack depth [[migration]] using the final velocity-depth model in Figure 10.1-9; (b) stack of the image gathers — depth image from prestack depth [[migration]] for the left-half of the line as in Figure 10.1-1. See text for the labeled events.
 
file:ch10_fig1-10.png|{{figure number|10.1-10}} The Southern Gas Basin line: (a) selected image gathers from the left-half of the line as in Figure 10.1-1 from prestack depth [[migration]] using the final velocity-depth model in Figure 10.1-9; (b) stack of the image gathers — depth image from prestack depth [[migration]] for the left-half of the line as in Figure 10.1-1. See text for the labeled events.
 
file:ch10_fig1-11.png|{{figure number|10.1-11}} The Southern Gas Basin line: (a) selected image gathers from the right-half of the line as in Figure 10.1-1 from prestack depth [[migration]] using the final velocity-depth model in Figure 10.1-9; (b) stack of the image gathers — depth image from prestack depth [[migration]] for the right-half of the line as in Figure 10.1-1. See text for the labeled events.
 
file:ch10_fig1-11.png|{{figure number|10.1-11}} The Southern Gas Basin line: (a) selected image gathers from the right-half of the line as in Figure 10.1-1 from prestack depth [[migration]] using the final velocity-depth model in Figure 10.1-9; (b) stack of the image gathers — depth image from prestack depth [[migration]] for the right-half of the line as in Figure 10.1-1. See text for the labeled events.
file:ch10_fig1-12.png|{{figure number|10.1-12}} The Southern Gas Basin line: (a) depth image from poststack depth [[migration]] using the same velocity-depth model in Figure 10.1-9 as for the depth image from prestack depth [[migration]] shown in Figure 10.1-10b; (b) time image from poststack time [[migration]]. These images are from the left-half of the line as in Figure 10.1-1. See text for the labeled events.
 
file:ch10_fig1-13.png|{{figure number|10.1-13}} The Southern Gas Basin line: (a) depth image from poststack depth [[migration]] using the same velocity-depth model in Figure 10.1-9 as for the depth image from prestack depth [[migration]] shown in Figure 10.1-11b; (b) time image from poststack time [[migration]]. These images are from the right-half of the line as in Figure 10.1-1. See text for the labeled events.
 
 
file:ch10_fig1-14.png|{{figure number|10.1-14}} The Southern Gas Basin line: image rays through the overburden model down to the base-Zechstein boundary. The velocity-depth model is the same as the final model shown in Figure 10.1-9.
 
file:ch10_fig1-14.png|{{figure number|10.1-14}} The Southern Gas Basin line: image rays through the overburden model down to the base-Zechstein boundary. The velocity-depth model is the same as the final model shown in Figure 10.1-9.
file:ch10_fig1-15.png|{{figure number|10.1-15}} The Southern Gas Basin line: modeled two-way zero-offset traveltimes associated with the layer boundaries included in the earth model in Figure 10.1-14. Actual traveltimes are shown in Figure 10.1-3.</gallery>
+
file:ch10_fig1-15.png|{{figure number|10.1-15}} The Southern Gas Basin line: modeled two-way zero-offset traveltimes associated with the layer boundaries included in the earth model in Figure 10.1-14. Actual traveltimes are shown in Figure 10.1-3.
 +
file:ch10_fig1-3.png|{{figure number|10.1-3}} The Southern Gas Basin line: time horizons interpreted from the unmigrated CMP-stacked section. See text for details.
 +
</gallery>
  
 
Aside from these two criteria, the estimated earth model needs to be validated by examining it for consistency with the structural model applicable to the area of interest. For instance, the faulting and folding implied by the the model must have the same patterns as in the true subsurface situation. [[Calibration to well tops]] is also part of the model validation procedure ([[model building]]).
 
Aside from these two criteria, the estimated earth model needs to be validated by examining it for consistency with the structural model applicable to the area of interest. For instance, the faulting and folding implied by the the model must have the same patterns as in the true subsurface situation. [[Calibration to well tops]] is also part of the model validation procedure ([[model building]]).

Latest revision as of 16:43, 2 October 2014

Seismic Data Analysis
Seismic-data-analysis.jpg
Series Investigations in Geophysics
Author Öz Yilmaz
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560801580
ISBN ISBN 978-1-56080-094-1
Store SEG Online Store


The final stage in earth modeling and imaging is the verification of the accuracy of the model itself (model updating). For an earth model in depth to be acceptable, it has to pass the following two tests:

  1. Image gathers from prestack depth migration using the earth model in question must exhibit flat events (Figures 10.1-10a and 10.1-11a). Events associated with multiples and converted waves (4-C seismic method) are not expected to be flat. Nevertheless, even with good models, usually, there also are some primary events that do not meet the flatness criterion. Violation of this criterion may occur because of erroneous layer velocities or 3-D effects that are not accounted for by 2-D modeling and imaging. Other sources of departures from flatness include strong lateral velocity variations that are much less than a cable length and effect of anisotropy on layer velocities.
  2. For an earth model in depth to be an acceptable representation of the subsurface geological model, it must be consistent with the seismic data used to estimate the model in question. To check for consistency, perform ray-theoretical modeling of zero-offset traveltimes associated with the layer boundaries included in the model (Figure 10.1-14). Then, superimpose the modeled traveltimes on the CMP-stacked section and observe any discrepancy between the modeled and the actual traveltimes (Figure 10.1-15). Here, we are assuming that the reflection traveltimes observed on a CMP-stacked section can be closely approximated by two-way zero-offset traveltimes. Actual traveltimes interpreted from the unmigrated CMP-stacked section are shown in Figure 10.1-3.

Aside from these two criteria, the estimated earth model needs to be validated by examining it for consistency with the structural model applicable to the area of interest. For instance, the faulting and folding implied by the the model must have the same patterns as in the true subsurface situation. Calibration to well tops is also part of the model validation procedure (model building).

See also

External links

find literature about
Model verification
SEG button search.png Datapages button.png GeoScienceWorld button.png OnePetro button.png Schlumberger button.png Google button.png AGI button.png