Difference between revisions of "Edward Jenner"

From SEG Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(added category)
(added section, spacing, removed heading links)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
| Membership =
 
| Membership =
 
}}
 
}}
 +
== SEG's J. Clarence Karcher Award 2003 ==
 +
The [[J. Clarence Karcher Award]] is being given to '''Edward Jenner''' in recognition of his contributions to the technology of exploration geophysics in the area of azimuthal 3D seismic processing with emphasis on the relationships of azimuthal variations of AVO attributes and velocity to reservoir properties.<ref>SEG Honors and Awards and Presidential Session, Official Program, SEG Annual Meeting, 4PM Sunday, 26 October 2003, Dallas Convention Center, Dallas TX. </ref>
  
== SEG's [[J. Clarence Karcher Award]] 2003 <ref>SEG Honors and Awards and Presidential Session, Official Program,
+
===Biography Citation for the J. Clarence Karcher Award ===
SEG Annual Meeting, 4PM Sunday, 26 October 2003, Dallas Convention Center, Dallas TX. </ref> ==
 
The J. Clarence Karcher Award is being given to
 
'''Edward Jenner''' in recognition of his contributions to the technology
 
of exploration geophysics in the area of azimuthal 3D seismic processing with emphasis on the relationships of azimuthal
 
variations of AVO attributes and velocity to reservoir properties.
 
 
 
===Biography Citation for the [[J. Clarence Karcher Award]] ===
 
 
''Contributed by [[Marty Williams]]''
 
''Contributed by [[Marty Williams]]''
 +
There are many technical and business chasms to transcend in our industry. One class of chasm that is hardest to cross is
 +
the one involving moving well reasoned theory and laboratory experience into effective production and finally economic impact. Edward Jenner has accomplished this crossing with techniques to observe and interpret azimuthally varying Pwave properties in reflection seismic data, an anisotropy problem that turns out to have been plaguing processing and interpretation since the dawn of reflection seismology.
  
There are many technical and business chasms to transcend
+
In short, Ed discovered a way to analyze and linearly fit traveltimes for azimuthally varying NMO and was then able to separate and linearly fit amplitude variation with offset and azimuth (AVOA) using his own recognition of linearity in [[Andreas Rüger|Rüger]]’s 1996 formulation of AVOA. In addition Ed recognized the induced coupling of the azimuthal AVO to the azimuthally varying NMO inherent in the current techniques for azimuthal analysis. (See his 2001
in our industry. One class of chasm that is hardest to cross is
 
the one involving moving well reasoned theory and laboratory experience into effective production and
 
finally economic impact. Edward
 
Jenner has accomplished this crossing with techniques to observe and
 
interpret azimuthally varying Pwave properties in reflection seismic data, an anisotropy problem
 
that turns out to have been plaguing processing and interpretation
 
since the dawn of reflection seismology.
 
 
 
In short, Ed discovered a way
 
to analyze and linearly fit traveltimes for azimuthally varying NMO and was then able to separate and linearly fit amplitude variation with offset and azimuth (AVOA) using his own
 
recognition of linearity in [[Andreas Rüger | Rüger]]’s 1996 formulation of AVOA.
 
In addition Ed recognized the induced coupling of the
 
azimuthal AVO to the azimuthally varying NMO inherent in
 
the current techniques for azimuthal analysis. (See his 2001
 
 
articles in THE LEADING EDGE for detail.) He also demonstrated the analysis conundrum when dealing with both structure and azimuthal anisotropy within the same data set.  
 
articles in THE LEADING EDGE for detail.) He also demonstrated the analysis conundrum when dealing with both structure and azimuthal anisotropy within the same data set.  
  
Ed started his education in astrophysics and followed this
+
Ed started his education in astrophysics and followed this path until he made the decision to take an internship at BP in
path until he made the decision to take an internship at BP in
+
1994. Although Ed’s experience had not trained him for the opportunity, he found that he loved the work. In 1994, Ed
1994. Although Ed’s experience had not trained him for the
+
started on his path as a geophysicist working on reflection profiling of the earth’s crust at the University of Leeds, where he received his master’s in Exploration Geophysics. Ed then attended the Colorado School of Mines (CSM) where he
opportunity, he found that he loved the work. In 1994, Ed
 
started on his path as a geophysicist working on reflection profiling of the earth’s crust at the University of Leeds, where he
 
received his master’s in Exploration Geophysics. Ed then
 
attended the Colorado School of Mines (CSM) where he
 
 
worked under the masters of theoretical seismic anisotropy.
 
worked under the masters of theoretical seismic anisotropy.
There, he became familiar with the language of anisotropy
 
from not only his professors ([[Ilya Tsvankin]] and
 
[[Vladimir Grechka]]), but also from his predecessors [[Andreas Rüger]] and
 
[[Tariq Alkhalifah]]. He made the decision to concentrate his PhD
 
in the applied aspects of reservoir geophysics under Tom
 
Davis. However, Ed did not leave behind the anisotropy.
 
Instead he planned on leveraging anisotropy to explain the
 
reservoirs he was researching. The only question was the how.
 
In his final year at CSM, Ed joined AXIS Geophysics for
 
the summer. His project on a BP 3D data set was to analyze a
 
reservoir for fracturing using AVOA. Within a matter of weeks,
 
  
Ed discovered the significance of the azimuthally varying
+
There, he became familiar with the language of anisotropy from not only his professors ([[Ilya Tsvankin]] and [[Vladimir Grechka]]), but also from his predecessors Andreas Rüger and [[Tariq Alkhalifah]]. He made the decision to concentrate his PhD in the applied aspects of reservoir geophysics under Tom Davis. However, Ed did not leave behind the anisotropy.
velocities, and how to correct the seismic data for the time distortions. Also within this time, he coded the linearized solutions for both NMOA and AVOA that led to the first
+
Instead he planned on leveraging anisotropy to explain the reservoirs he was researching. The only question was the how.
nonazimuth sectored data volumes of both properties ever created. On his return to CSM, his PhD in reservoir fracture
+
 
analysis quickly progressed with the use of his new techniques. He graduated in 2001 having made great contributions
+
In his final year at CSM, Ed joined AXIS Geophysics for the summer. His project on a BP 3D data set was to analyze a
to the Reservoir Characterization Project on Weyburn oil field
+
reservoir for fracturing using AVOA. Within a matter of weeks, Ed discovered the significance of the azimuthally varying
in Canada. Ed also built a foundation from which many of
+
velocities, and how to correct the seismic data for the time distortions. Also within this time, he coded the linearized solutions for both NMOA and AVOA that led to the first nonazimuth sectored data volumes of both properties ever created. On his return to CSM, his PhD in reservoir fracture analysis quickly progressed with the use of his new techniques. He graduated in 2001 having made great contributions to the Reservoir Characterization Project on Weyburn oil field
the other students in the Reservoir Characterization Project
+
in Canada. Ed also built a foundation from which many of the other students in the Reservoir Characterization Project
 
could follow toward a much deeper understanding of fractured oil and gas reservoirs.
 
could follow toward a much deeper understanding of fractured oil and gas reservoirs.
  
Ed has now started his career in geophysics as one of the
+
Ed has now started his career in geophysics as one of the new masters in anisotropy working with GMG/AXIS (a business unit of Input/Output Corporation). He is active in the SEG and his local chapter, the Denver Geophysical Society, and he participates in assisting the geophysics students at CSM through mentoring and lectures. Ed and his wife Lucy enjoy
new masters in anisotropy working with GMG/AXIS (a business unit of Input/Output Corporation). He is active in the
+
both a new house in Denver, Colorado, and a new son, Graeme. Ed thrives on the outdoors where he rock climbs, hikes with
SEG and his local chapter, the Denver Geophysical Society,
 
and he participates in assisting the geophysics students at CSM
 
through mentoring and lectures. Ed and his wife Lucy enjoy
 
both a new house in Denver, Colorado, and a new son, Graeme.
 
Ed thrives on the outdoors where he rock climbs, hikes with
 
 
his family, and mountain bike rides all with the same enthusiasm he puts into geophysics.
 
his family, and mountain bike rides all with the same enthusiasm he puts into geophysics.
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
<references />
+
{{reflist}}
 +
 
 +
== External links ==
 +
{{search}}
  
 
[[Category:Denver Geophysical Society]]
 
[[Category:Denver Geophysical Society]]

Revision as of 17:52, 8 April 2015

Edward Jenner
Edward Jenner headshot.png
PhD university Colorado School of Mines

SEG's J. Clarence Karcher Award 2003

The J. Clarence Karcher Award is being given to Edward Jenner in recognition of his contributions to the technology of exploration geophysics in the area of azimuthal 3D seismic processing with emphasis on the relationships of azimuthal variations of AVO attributes and velocity to reservoir properties.[1]

Biography Citation for the J. Clarence Karcher Award

Contributed by Marty Williams There are many technical and business chasms to transcend in our industry. One class of chasm that is hardest to cross is the one involving moving well reasoned theory and laboratory experience into effective production and finally economic impact. Edward Jenner has accomplished this crossing with techniques to observe and interpret azimuthally varying Pwave properties in reflection seismic data, an anisotropy problem that turns out to have been plaguing processing and interpretation since the dawn of reflection seismology.

In short, Ed discovered a way to analyze and linearly fit traveltimes for azimuthally varying NMO and was then able to separate and linearly fit amplitude variation with offset and azimuth (AVOA) using his own recognition of linearity in Rüger’s 1996 formulation of AVOA. In addition Ed recognized the induced coupling of the azimuthal AVO to the azimuthally varying NMO inherent in the current techniques for azimuthal analysis. (See his 2001 articles in THE LEADING EDGE for detail.) He also demonstrated the analysis conundrum when dealing with both structure and azimuthal anisotropy within the same data set.

Ed started his education in astrophysics and followed this path until he made the decision to take an internship at BP in 1994. Although Ed’s experience had not trained him for the opportunity, he found that he loved the work. In 1994, Ed started on his path as a geophysicist working on reflection profiling of the earth’s crust at the University of Leeds, where he received his master’s in Exploration Geophysics. Ed then attended the Colorado School of Mines (CSM) where he worked under the masters of theoretical seismic anisotropy.

There, he became familiar with the language of anisotropy from not only his professors (Ilya Tsvankin and Vladimir Grechka), but also from his predecessors Andreas Rüger and Tariq Alkhalifah. He made the decision to concentrate his PhD in the applied aspects of reservoir geophysics under Tom Davis. However, Ed did not leave behind the anisotropy. Instead he planned on leveraging anisotropy to explain the reservoirs he was researching. The only question was the how.

In his final year at CSM, Ed joined AXIS Geophysics for the summer. His project on a BP 3D data set was to analyze a reservoir for fracturing using AVOA. Within a matter of weeks, Ed discovered the significance of the azimuthally varying velocities, and how to correct the seismic data for the time distortions. Also within this time, he coded the linearized solutions for both NMOA and AVOA that led to the first nonazimuth sectored data volumes of both properties ever created. On his return to CSM, his PhD in reservoir fracture analysis quickly progressed with the use of his new techniques. He graduated in 2001 having made great contributions to the Reservoir Characterization Project on Weyburn oil field in Canada. Ed also built a foundation from which many of the other students in the Reservoir Characterization Project could follow toward a much deeper understanding of fractured oil and gas reservoirs.

Ed has now started his career in geophysics as one of the new masters in anisotropy working with GMG/AXIS (a business unit of Input/Output Corporation). He is active in the SEG and his local chapter, the Denver Geophysical Society, and he participates in assisting the geophysics students at CSM through mentoring and lectures. Ed and his wife Lucy enjoy both a new house in Denver, Colorado, and a new son, Graeme. Ed thrives on the outdoors where he rock climbs, hikes with his family, and mountain bike rides all with the same enthusiasm he puts into geophysics.

References

  1. SEG Honors and Awards and Presidential Session, Official Program, SEG Annual Meeting, 4PM Sunday, 26 October 2003, Dallas Convention Center, Dallas TX.

External links

find literature about
Edward Jenner
SEG button search.png Datapages button.png GeoScienceWorld button.png OnePetro button.png Schlumberger button.png Google button.png AGI button.png