Diffraction from a half-plane
![]() | |
Series | Geophysical References Series |
---|---|
Title | Problems in Exploration Seismology and their Solutions |
Author | Lloyd P. Geldart and Robert E. Sheriff |
Chapter | 2 |
Pages | 7 - 46 |
DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560801733 |
ISBN | ISBN 9781560801153 |
Store | SEG Online Store |
Problem 2.19
The general equation for determining the diffraction effect of a plane surface is given by equation (2.19b). Show that the diffraction effect of the half-plane in Figure 2.19a is given by the integral where
( )
where is a constant, is the velocity (assumed to be constant), while , , and are defined in Figure 2.19a, and , , and are two-way traveltimes along , and .
Background
The use of rays to describe wave propagation simplifies the phenomenon by ignoring diffraction (spreading of energy radiating from a virtual point source). Since a wave is reflected by all parts ofa surface, we can consider each point on the surface as a point source (Huygens's principle, see problem 3.1) and integrate over the surface to get the correct total effect. For a coincident source and receiver, the integral of the effects of point sources over the surface can be transformed into a line integral around the boundary of the surface (see Sheriff and Geldart, 1995, Section 2.8.2). When the origin is over the surface, the integration gives two terms, one term representing the reflection given by ray theory, the other the diffraction. When the origin is not over the surface, the reflection term is zero leaving only the diffraction term.
The diffraction response of a plane area to a unit impulse (see Sheriff and Geldart, 1955, Section 15.2.5) emitted by a source at the origin and recorded at the origin is obtained by integrating the quantity around the entire boundary of the area, where is given by equation (2.19b) [see Sheriff and Geldart, 1995, equation (2.131)]:
( )
where is the response of a unit element of the boundary, is the two-way traveltime from the origin to the element of the boundry, and is the angle shown in Figure 2.19a.
Solution
In Figure 2.19a
where is normal to and . The points and are in fact at ; thus, on integrating, goes from to while 6 goes from to . Dividing by , we get the following relation between the traveltimes:
( )
Then
( )
and
( )
From equation (2.19c) we have
so
Substituting this expression in equation (2.19b), we obtain the following result for the diffraction effect of a unit length of the boundary in Figure 2.19a:
Substituting in the numerator, we get
To get the total diffraction effect of the half-plane, we integrate this expression around the four sides of the half-plane. Three of the four sides are at infinity so that is infinite and the fraction, being proportional to , vanishes. Therefore the effect reduces to the integral along . Because of symmetry, we can integrate along and double the result. Thus, the diffraction function for a half-plane is
Continue reading
Previous section | Next section |
---|---|
Attenuation calculations | General form of Snell’s law |
Previous chapter | Next chapter |
Introduction | Partitioning at an interface |
Also in this chapter
- The basic elastic constants
- Interrelationships among elastic constants
- Magnitude of disturbance from a seismic source
- Magnitudes of elastic constants
- General solutions of the wave equation
- Wave equation in cylindrical and spherical coordinates
- Sum of waves of different frequencies and group velocity
- Magnitudes of seismic wave parameters
- Potential functions used to solve wave equations
- Boundary conditions at different types of interfaces
- Boundary conditions in terms of potential functions
- Disturbance produced by a point source
- Far- and near-field effects for a point source
- Rayleigh-wave relationships
- Directional geophone responses to different waves
- Tube-wave relationships
- Relation between nepers and decibels
- Attenuation calculations