Difference between revisions of "De-extinction"

From SEG Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Working on summary)
m
 
(58 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This page is currently being authorized by an undergraduate researcher at Penn State Brandywine. The page will be posted before the end of November 2015.
+
De-extinction is the process of creating an organism which is or greatly resembles a member of an extinct species. De-extinction requires an in-depth study of the biophysical conditions where the species can live and reproduce in relation to other species, including humans and ability to adapt to environmental changes.<ref name=martinelli>Martinelli, L., Oksanen, M., & Siipi, H. (2014). De-extinction: a novel and remarkable case of bioobjectification. Croatian Medical Journal, 55(4), 423–427.[http://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2014.55.423] Accessed October 29, 2015 </ref> There are pros and cons when it comes to de-extinction and bringing back species. These pros and cons are often debated with many unanswered questions if we can bring these species back. Many people think that it is our responsibility to bring back these species, because humans were the ones to drive them to extinction. The main way in which de-extinction can occur is through cloning. The woolly mammoth is the closest species to be brought back, followed by the passenger pigeon.
This is a dummy article to help you get started with creating pages in the wiki. Click ''Edit'' at the top and copy the text to use in your article. See [[Help:Creating articles|creating articles]] for more information.  
 
  
The first paragraph is usually a short dictionary-style definition of the subject matter. The gives the reader a quick answer, which may be all they required, and reassures them that they have come to the right page.  
+
== Methods ==
 +
Cloning is one of the main methods to bringing back these extinct animals. It takes extensive research, highly trained professionals and the best technology.
  
== First heading ==
+
=== Cloning ===
The main headings in the article are ''second'' level headings, defined with two equals signs in the wikitext. You never need to use the top-level heading style, defined with one equals sign, as it is reserved for article titles. As with a scientific article, you have plenty of freedom about how to organize your content, but the reader may have some expectations about the order and style that you may want to take into account. <ref>Mooney et al., 2013. [http://www.pnas.org/content/110/Supplement_1/3665.full Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 110, p. 3665-3672.</ref>.
+
Cloning relies heavily on genetic engineering and technology and the use of DNA synthesizing.<ref name=martinelli /> Scientists believe that they have the technology to bring back species that have been extinct. Cross-species cloning is using a mammal that is closely related to the other animal. The scientists can use donor cells to transfer genetic material from one cell to another. The procedure used to produce cloning animals involves several steps and highly trained professionals. The first step is to identify a suitable nuclear donor cell in which to clone. Skin cells are often used to extract the DNA to put into those donor cells.<ref name=smith>Smith, L. C., Bordignon, V., Babkine, M., Fecteau, G., & Keefer, C. (2000). Benefits and problems with cloning animals. The Canadian Veterinary Journal, 41(12), 919–924. Accessed on November 8, 2015</ref>
  
Start with a brief bit of background about the subject. Relate it to other topics, using plenty of links. Create links with a pair of square brackets around key technical words and phrases.
 
  
=== Subheading ===
+
== The debate ==
In longer articles, it may make sense to have another level of headings. There are not many occasions when you will need to use '''H4''' headings (four '''=''' signs), so don't go there unless it's unavoidable. Never use more than four.<ref>Matt Hall, 2013, pers. comm. Sorry, this is the best reference I can find.</ref>
+
Many scientists and researchers are in a debate on whether to bring back these extinct animals. There are many pros and cons, with unanswered questions if we do bring them back. De-extinction has raised a number of ethical and political questions that many scientists do not know how to answer. Many people feel that it is our responsibility to bring back these animals because we have the technology.
  
== Second heading ==
+
=== Pros ===
[[File:Eagle-ford-gets-spotlight04.jpg|thumb]]
+
Some researchers and scientists believe that it is our responsibility to bring back these extinct animals, because we are the ones who made them extinct. Many scientists also believe that introducing these new species will help with genetic variation and start to introduce new species all together in the future.<ref name=switek>Switek, B. (2013, March 12). The Promise and Pitfalls of Resurrection Ecology – Phenomena. Retrieved September 24, 2015, from http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/03/12/the-promise-and-pitfalls-of-resurrection-ecology/
You can add as many sections as you think you need to 'spiral out' from the core of the topic. Use judgment to decide when to split out a separate article.  
+
Accessed November 8, 2015 </ref>
  
=== Subheading ===
+
=== Cons ===
In longer articles, it may make sense to have another level of headings. There are not many occasions when you will need to use '''H4''' headings (four '''=''' signs), so don't go there unless it's unavoidable. Never use more than four.<ref>Matt Hall, 2013, pers. comm. Sorry, this is the best reference I can find.</ref>
+
There are many concerns from scientists and researchers when it comes to bringing back these animals. Some of these concerns are resource allocation, species identification and classification, and the relationship between technology and nature preservation.<ref name=friese>Friese, C., & Marris, C. (2014). Making De-Extinction Mundane? PLoS Biology, 12(3), 1–3. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001825 Accessed November 8, 2015 </ref> Some fear that the re-created species may become vectors or reservoirs for viruses.<ref name=martinelli /> There is no evidence or research to show that bringing back these animals will not cause harm to other species or even humans. There could also be pregnancy concerns when it comes to the surrogates carrying these engineered animals. Those animals are called the “mother” animal. There could be abnormalities to the newborn, which could cause some problems seeing how we don’t know what kind of personalities these new animals could bring and how they would react with other animals.<ref name=smith /> There is debate about the constant changing environment that can effect these animals who are used to a cold climate all year round. <ref name=switek /> This could be a problem seeing how our planet keeps getting warmer.
  
== See also ==
 
Other closely related articles in this wiki include:
 
  
* [[Earthquake]]
+
== Woolly mammoth ==
 +
[[File:640px-Woolly mammoth 2.jpg|200px | thumb | Woolly Mammoth the "Arctic Giant"]]
 +
The [[woolly mammoth]] is probably the most charismatic de-extinction candidate.<ref name=switek /> Four thousand years after the woolly mammoth vanished from the Earth, scientists have deciphered the genetic blueprint that may offer a key to bringing them back. Scientists have done this by recovering DNA from two long dead individuals and a team of researchers have sequenced the species entire genome. The mammoths’ close relative, the Asian elephant, would be the perfect host for this genome to be implanted.<ref name=kaplan>Kaplan, S. (2015, April 24). “De-extinction” of the woolly mammoth: A step closer. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/04/24/de-extinction-and-the-wooly-mammoth-genome/ Accessed on November 8, 2015</ref> A Harvard team is working to introduce specific DNA variants, like hair, tusks, fat and cold resistance to the Asian elephant. Even though the woolly mammoth is the closest animal to de-extinction, it still may take many years. Making an elephant's genes 9% mammoth might take 20 years to develop.<ref name=six extinct animals, and how we can bring them back>Six Extinct Animals, and How We Can Bring Them Back | DiscoverMagazine.com. (2015.). Retrieved October 20, 2015, from http://discovermagazine.com/galleries/2015/jan-feb/de-extinction/ Accessed on November 8, 2015</ref>
 +
 
 +
== Passenger pigeon ==
 +
The passenger pigeon could be resurrected by splicing its genes into the genome of its close cousin, the band-tailed pigeon.<ref name=six extinct animals, and how we can bring them back>Six Extinct Animals, and How We Can Bring Them Back | DiscoverMagazine.com. (2015.). Retrieved October 20, 2015, from http://discovermagazine.com/galleries/2015/jan-feb/de-extinction/ Accessed on November 8, 2015</ref> The passenger pigeon is one of the mammals that became extinct due to humans. Humans used to hunt and shoot these animals, being afraid that they were carrying special messages and were hunted for sport. One of the last passenger pigeons died in a zoo, and is now preserved in a museum. Scientists believe that they can use the DNA from the zoo pigeon and start cloning. The band-tailed pigeon can be implanted with the passenger pigeon DNA to start the cloning process. Once scientists have created a passenger pigeon like genome, they will insert the altered DNA into reproductive cells in the band-tailed pigeon embryos.<ref name=zimmer>Zimmer, C., 30, for N. G. P. A., & 2014. (2014). Century After Extinction, Passenger Pigeons Remain Iconic—And Scientists Hope to Bring Them Back. Retrieved October 3, 2015, from http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/08/140831-passenger-pigeon-martha-deextinction-dna-animals-species/ Accessed on November 8, 2015</ref>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== See also ==
 +
 
 +
* [[Extinction]]
 
* [[Earth system science]]
 
* [[Earth system science]]
* [[Solar energy]]
+
* [[Natural disasters and hazards]]
 +
 
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
Line 33: Line 41:
  
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==
Add any other relevant external links in the section.
 
  
* The home page of [http://www.bw.psu.edu/ Penn State Brandywine], the home of the EARTH 100 wiki article writers!
+
* [http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2013/04/125-species-revival/zimmer-text Bringing Them Back to Life] - by National Geographic Magazine (April 2013)
* [http://www.eoearth.org/ Encyclopedia of Earth] - one of the sites I want you to explore to look for supporting articles.
+
* [http://www.livescience.com/51424-woolly-mammoth-genome-sequenced.html/ Woolly Mammoth Clones Closer Than Ever, Thanks to Genome Sequencing] - by Live Science Magazine (July 2, 2015)
* You should also search the websites for NASA, NOAA, USGS, EPA, and the [http://education.nationalgeographic.com/encyclopedia/ National Geographic Education Encyclopedia].
+
* [http://longnow.org/revive/projects/passenger-pigeon/ Waking the Dead: Bringing Extinct Species Back to Life] - by The Long Now Foundation
* Please DO NOT list the long URLs here! Let the user hover over text to get to a website (such as the examples provided above).
+
* [http://www.voanews.com/content/how-to-clone-a-mammoth-science-of-de-extinction/2780036.html/ How to Clone a Mammoth: Science of De-extinction] - by Voice of America (May 20, 2015)
 +
 
  
 
[[Category: Basics]]
 
[[Category: Basics]]

Latest revision as of 14:17, 23 November 2015

De-extinction is the process of creating an organism which is or greatly resembles a member of an extinct species. De-extinction requires an in-depth study of the biophysical conditions where the species can live and reproduce in relation to other species, including humans and ability to adapt to environmental changes.[1] There are pros and cons when it comes to de-extinction and bringing back species. These pros and cons are often debated with many unanswered questions if we can bring these species back. Many people think that it is our responsibility to bring back these species, because humans were the ones to drive them to extinction. The main way in which de-extinction can occur is through cloning. The woolly mammoth is the closest species to be brought back, followed by the passenger pigeon.

Methods

Cloning is one of the main methods to bringing back these extinct animals. It takes extensive research, highly trained professionals and the best technology.

Cloning

Cloning relies heavily on genetic engineering and technology and the use of DNA synthesizing.[1] Scientists believe that they have the technology to bring back species that have been extinct. Cross-species cloning is using a mammal that is closely related to the other animal. The scientists can use donor cells to transfer genetic material from one cell to another. The procedure used to produce cloning animals involves several steps and highly trained professionals. The first step is to identify a suitable nuclear donor cell in which to clone. Skin cells are often used to extract the DNA to put into those donor cells.[2]


The debate

Many scientists and researchers are in a debate on whether to bring back these extinct animals. There are many pros and cons, with unanswered questions if we do bring them back. De-extinction has raised a number of ethical and political questions that many scientists do not know how to answer. Many people feel that it is our responsibility to bring back these animals because we have the technology.

Pros

Some researchers and scientists believe that it is our responsibility to bring back these extinct animals, because we are the ones who made them extinct. Many scientists also believe that introducing these new species will help with genetic variation and start to introduce new species all together in the future.[3]

Cons

There are many concerns from scientists and researchers when it comes to bringing back these animals. Some of these concerns are resource allocation, species identification and classification, and the relationship between technology and nature preservation.[4] Some fear that the re-created species may become vectors or reservoirs for viruses.[1] There is no evidence or research to show that bringing back these animals will not cause harm to other species or even humans. There could also be pregnancy concerns when it comes to the surrogates carrying these engineered animals. Those animals are called the “mother” animal. There could be abnormalities to the newborn, which could cause some problems seeing how we don’t know what kind of personalities these new animals could bring and how they would react with other animals.[2] There is debate about the constant changing environment that can effect these animals who are used to a cold climate all year round. [3] This could be a problem seeing how our planet keeps getting warmer.


Woolly mammoth

Woolly Mammoth the "Arctic Giant"

The woolly mammoth is probably the most charismatic de-extinction candidate.[3] Four thousand years after the woolly mammoth vanished from the Earth, scientists have deciphered the genetic blueprint that may offer a key to bringing them back. Scientists have done this by recovering DNA from two long dead individuals and a team of researchers have sequenced the species entire genome. The mammoths’ close relative, the Asian elephant, would be the perfect host for this genome to be implanted.[5] A Harvard team is working to introduce specific DNA variants, like hair, tusks, fat and cold resistance to the Asian elephant. Even though the woolly mammoth is the closest animal to de-extinction, it still may take many years. Making an elephant's genes 9% mammoth might take 20 years to develop.[6]

Passenger pigeon

The passenger pigeon could be resurrected by splicing its genes into the genome of its close cousin, the band-tailed pigeon.[7] The passenger pigeon is one of the mammals that became extinct due to humans. Humans used to hunt and shoot these animals, being afraid that they were carrying special messages and were hunted for sport. One of the last passenger pigeons died in a zoo, and is now preserved in a museum. Scientists believe that they can use the DNA from the zoo pigeon and start cloning. The band-tailed pigeon can be implanted with the passenger pigeon DNA to start the cloning process. Once scientists have created a passenger pigeon like genome, they will insert the altered DNA into reproductive cells in the band-tailed pigeon embryos.[8]


See also


References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Martinelli, L., Oksanen, M., & Siipi, H. (2014). De-extinction: a novel and remarkable case of bioobjectification. Croatian Medical Journal, 55(4), 423–427.[1] Accessed October 29, 2015
  2. 2.0 2.1 Smith, L. C., Bordignon, V., Babkine, M., Fecteau, G., & Keefer, C. (2000). Benefits and problems with cloning animals. The Canadian Veterinary Journal, 41(12), 919–924. Accessed on November 8, 2015
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Switek, B. (2013, March 12). The Promise and Pitfalls of Resurrection Ecology – Phenomena. Retrieved September 24, 2015, from http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/03/12/the-promise-and-pitfalls-of-resurrection-ecology/ Accessed November 8, 2015
  4. Friese, C., & Marris, C. (2014). Making De-Extinction Mundane? PLoS Biology, 12(3), 1–3. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001825 Accessed November 8, 2015
  5. Kaplan, S. (2015, April 24). “De-extinction” of the woolly mammoth: A step closer. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/04/24/de-extinction-and-the-wooly-mammoth-genome/ Accessed on November 8, 2015
  6. Six Extinct Animals, and How We Can Bring Them Back | DiscoverMagazine.com. (2015.). Retrieved October 20, 2015, from http://discovermagazine.com/galleries/2015/jan-feb/de-extinction/ Accessed on November 8, 2015
  7. Six Extinct Animals, and How We Can Bring Them Back | DiscoverMagazine.com. (2015.). Retrieved October 20, 2015, from http://discovermagazine.com/galleries/2015/jan-feb/de-extinction/ Accessed on November 8, 2015
  8. Zimmer, C., 30, for N. G. P. A., & 2014. (2014). Century After Extinction, Passenger Pigeons Remain Iconic—And Scientists Hope to Bring Them Back. Retrieved October 3, 2015, from http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/08/140831-passenger-pigeon-martha-deextinction-dna-animals-species/ Accessed on November 8, 2015


External links